Quote:
Originally posted by Amaru
What? who was calling anyone anything?
Anyways, viewing this as a conspiracy is silly considering CNN had been having technical issues all night. As a Ron Paul sympathizer, I can tell you that they were actually fairly complimentary of him for most of the night. They gave him the amount of coverage you would expect the third place finisher to get but obviously more attention moved towards the two candidates battling for first as the night went on. People are too paranoid.
|
It comes from the evidence that Iran is the new go-to target for this election year, and that war in Iran or other countries is a very real possibility. It comes from the fact, yes the fact that CNN, FOX and other networks will outright support and FEARMONGER (just like your name there) the entire populace over Iran, to support a "kinetic military action". They are doing this now, and they do it every day. Every republican candidate's platform (other than Ron Paul), has the "Iran Threat" as a primary 'concern'.
They need to uphold this 'scare' until the election passes, and then we are looking at the frightening possibility of more real war (maybe sooner). This is very well known, even among absolute cretins and the not-so-worldly among us. Any active-duty military personnel going on Live Network Television and expressing his opinion on why he wants to be home and thinks we shouldn't go to Iran, and that Israel doesn't need military support allied or otherwise, during an extremely congested viewing time (Republican primary debates), is EXTREMELY damaging to the end-game of the current "Iran scare".
It really has nothing to do with Ron Paul at this point. Ron Paul is irrelevant. What's relevant is the fact that CNN/FOX are the primary "fear factories" for war, Iran being the current (and obvious) directive.
This is when he was cut off, I am riding on a 1% probability that it was a coincidental error. You may believe what you want to believe. I will do the same.