ROLLING STONE MAG: BUSH 'WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY?'
Tue Apr 18 2006 18:30:13 ET

"George W. Bush's presidency appears headed for colossal historical disgrace."

So declares ROLLING STONE magazine in a planned cover story, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

"The Worst President in History?" streets Friday.
----

This is guaranteed to spark controversy. Personally, I don't know enough about every president to say who is the worst, but I think he's up there

This seems like it would be a good read but it definitely spark controversy. Personally, I do agree with you since I also think he is up there.

On a side note, it is nice to see the Pearl Jam album being mentioned.

looks like i am going to subscribe again!

he is, definitely.

That caught my eye more than anything else, "Best album in 10 years". This intrigues me.

Haha, awesome. Their political articles are actually often really good and in depth, sometimes very long as well. At least they still do some things right. I'm really glad they gave the cover to this instead of Nick.

thank God somebody finally said it

i think he probably is, no one has handeled things so badly, and done so many bad things.
i also think they should have 'the worst administration ever' too.

His cabnit and administration have been playing musical chairs a lot over the past 2 months. But something tells me Kerry wouldn't have done much better either. Being president is a tough-a** job.

this is why I still suscribe to RS ol

I wanna see his face RIGHT NOW!

well, I hope he falls dead today before tommorow. This dumbass is messing up the WHOLE world .

it's the truth!!!

why did the Us re-elect him??

One decent reason I saw was so he could finish up the job(s) overseas, and his heavy involvement over those missions. I know a few people who were skeptical about what Kerry would've done to Iraq (or if anything would get done) if Bush's power was transfered over to him.

Travis05 supported Bush in the last elections. Just say it bitch.

Actually, no. I was hoping an independent party would rise up past Catsup Kerry and "Brainiac" Bush, but they didn't. (Even though the chances of that happening were below slim.) With that, I thought a new change in the White House was needed. I didn't like the way Bush was handeling our foreign relations, the search for Osama, some of Iraq, as well as a couple domestic issues including Natural Energy Resources and Immigration Policy at that time. But nope, that didn't happen either. Now we have to wait until 08' for another new president...unless Bush's approval rating goes dips more lower and there's a plan or plot against him for his impeachment. I'm just currently suprised yet annoyed that Donald Rumsfeld hasn't stepped down from his position, as the majority of the head Bush Administration is doing. But I could go on and on and on about this topic. So I'll stop right here.