Which is why she choose to unveil her pregnancy at the VMAs when she had all summer to do so elsewhere?
Elsewhere like? Cause she didn't start showing until the month of the VMAs which was obviously the platform for the world to see, instead of speculation and rumors.
i did read the op obviously. However like i said, the title which attracts people to the thread implies that she's not here for gimmicks at all hence ilays' post.
And yet again, that is why we are taught to read entire passages in school instead of just one line.
I think she was shading IASF more than anything. And it is not even shade, she is just saying the Glastonbury was in the vein of her new album "4" which in retrospect of her other albums was more focused on music. Why are people getting mad at the flawless King?
Elsewhere like? Cause she didn't start showing until the month of the VMAs which was obviously the platform for the world to see, instead of speculation and rumors.
No, they spiked because she performed at the VMAs just like everyone else who performed. No one is going to buy some music because a person is pregnant, what the hell is wrong with people on this forum?
Let's stop with that ********. The album barely sold 7k more than the week before. The pregnancy didn't do anything for that album.
She had one of the best performances that night (if not the best) and saw a little increase accordingly.
I remember when she was getting hits, they dragged everybody because she had the biggest hit now I saw some Bey stans saying having hit singles let alone #1 hits is forgettable and those don't matter.
but my "reson for reporting " was very convincing 
