Ok I actually read the article now...
and it's terrible

There's many ways to drag the franchise but being blatantly dumb by saying things like
Quote:
Why is it never again convenient to use the time-turner after Harry Potter and The Prisoner of Azkaban? Wouldn't this be a great device to save dear old Sirius from his mysterious demise and prevent your friends from falling into an ambush?
|
and nitpick on stuff like
Quote:
Then the last, and saddest attempt to add cultural depth, Rowling announced after her last book that Dumbledore had never married or had kids because he was gay. There is little in the books to indicate this but why not give another half-hearted aside to a politically contentious issue if it will create hype and add to the coffers.
|
is not the way to go about it
Quote:
Why do the deathly hallows play such a small role in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows? Why do the three hallows combined allow one to conquer death but in the deathly hallows tale, the cape alone allowed its first owner to escape death?
|
Did this guy even read the book?