Then how would you know anything about her backing track?

Oh, please! Trying to bring Xtina into this. I'd stan for her anyday over Gaga.

And yes, just watch her Poker Face performances on YouTube where the backing track obviously "overpowers" her live singing. I'm not even saying it's bad, but y'all act as if her live singing is some spectacular vocal achievement when it is just mediocre at best. The point is, she's lip-synced before, whether it is some technical difficulty () or not, and any excuses won't change that fact. Let's move on.

Oh, the irony.

Alright - I'm outta this thread. I've made my point.

It's too early for a purple-colored headache.

I'll leave you with this:

Good, because I've made MY point when you "tried" to not get yourself into this. Now as you were.

Now please, stop.

Some people shouldn't waste their breath.

Also, in response to the question -- no. I'm here for artists who are actually capable of fulfilling the title of their supposed profession.

NEVER.

27 People are Britney Stans.

No. But I don't mind a pre-recorded track. I would not stan for an artist that just lips the song that I play on my Ipod.

Lady Gaga's voice is the reason I paid attention to her. It's perfect for a pop star. And she always gets praise for it at every show:

~Entertainment Weekly

If her voice is "overrated" to you, then it is as overrated as Britney's dancing was in her prime.

Yes, technically speaking Christina has a good voice, but some people like listening to a song where the singer doesn't blast out every single word.

Come on now people, Gaga's backtrack was so loud in 2008.

I'd rather the question be: Would you stan for a popstar that hasn't proved themselves as a vocalist?

Because everyone from Whitney to Christina to Mariah to Beyoncé has lip-synced a song before or not put enough vocals on it to qualify as live.