I challenge you this too. If it were an older man sending these things to a young girl would it be the same?
I wouldn't care either way.
I'm not into that double standards crap. Just as the boy would be less than 2 years from being legal the girl would be as well. This isn't uncommon anyway.
Lee why are you arguing with yourself? No one said it's any less of a crime or any less punishable because a woman was the offender, or that women can't be sex offenders.
Lee why are you arguing with yourself? No one said it's any less of a crime or any less punishable because a woman was the offender, or that women can't be sex offenders.
I'm not arguing with myself. I dont see how anyone can not see the double standard in saying there is nothing wrong with the situation. That is all
And its good to, you know, have a civil conversation for once with people which isn't often found on here
here where i live, you can date someone over 18 when you are 16. so basically you can be 16 and you can date an 47 year old guy if you wish.
18 is the hard and fast cutoff. You can be 18 and date a 90 year old for all we care. But if a 17 has sexual acts with an 18 year old, we get our panties all riled up. Arbitrary, really.
18 is the hard and fast cutoff. You can be 18 and date a 90 year old for all we care. But if a 17 has sexual acts with an 18 year old, we get our panties all riled up. Arbitrary, really.
well that sucks 4 u haha here its from 16 + including sex.
No one said it's any less of a crime or any less punishable because a woman was the offender, or that women can't be sex offenders.
