No one ran a campaign about bitterness towards whites. on the other hand trumps campaign was based on a bitterness about minorities and basically anyone different. The thing that propelled trump was hate for anyone who wasn't a white straight male christian , not the other way round
I understand the reason, although some of it is just gratuitous but I'll repeat.
"Being on the upper echelon of the privilege scale does not make you invulnerable to attacks on esteem, identity, (pride) and self worth. The left were drunk of the idea of social justice to let such a simple reality inform their conduct & effectiveness of their agenda."
At the end of the day plpeoples feelings matter. You will always be met with backlash when speaking down to a racial demographic as if theyre a monolithic community. Imagine the article "Gay black men, protect yourselves". "Black people, why much homophobia in hip hop" "Why are black people disproportionately arrested for violent crime" Imagine the outrage. There is a reality of certain communities needing particular attention on certain issues, yet it's only with white demographics where we seem to think it's OK to dismiss all tact. No matter how righteous your point, you always have to be concerned with the nature of your communication. Just look at the top comments in the link I posted, people who consider themselves allies are once again taking offence to the tone of a conversation, imagine the response those who are less liberal.
I'm not against the conversations that have been had, or against the idea of sometimes employing provocative dialogue but I just think we've lost sight of actually trying to effectively communicate in a way which helps the cause(s) & reaches out those whom need to hear and be educated by it.
