Harris by FAR. he embodied Dumbledore to the dot. his mannerism, he looked so kind and wise as well. his presence as a whole was more majestic, calming and calming. the other One looks evil.
This. Harris got that aura that just made him THE perfect Dumbledore.
Harris by FAR. he embodied Dumbledore to the dot. his mannerism, he looked so kind and wise as well. his presence as a whole was more majestic, calming and calming. the other One looks evil.
YES! I would have loved to see how he would have been in the later movies when his role got much more interesting.
Richard to me was more like how I pictured Dumbledore in the books, however he was very frail and had he lived on and done all of the films I truly don't know how he would've acted out the battle scenes etc. He had the warmth and kindness of Dumbledore but I think perhaps was slightly TOO kind? And too soft and cute, if that makes sense?
Gambon... Ugh, I actually really dislike his portrayal, he seems cold a lot of the time, something Dumbledore isn't at all (yeah he ignores Harry for a bit but that's about it...) I mean the whole famous scene of him grabbing + screaming at Harry in GOF is literally just the tip of the iceberg imo.
I think they both did great for different reasons.
Richard Harris captured the wise, gentle parts of him while Gambon really fit the powerful, eccentric parts of Dumbledore
I thought I made the mistake again, but it was actually about Dumbledore this time.