Quote:
Originally posted by Alejandrawrrr
She's one of the biggest icons of our time, but no, she's not timeless and will not be seen as a legend in 20 years time. She was never talented, never respected (celebrities who generally always have to say nice things about each other for the sake of their brand don't count), nor original or a pioneer of anything she did - the young teen pop thing was already smashing with the Spice Girls, NSYNC & the Backstreet Boys, and the people who she is credited for making "clones" of like Christina already had their image and just so happened to release shortly after.
Her success from 99-03 was INCREDIBLE, but unless you die young, a legend should never experience the harsh drop off she did after ITZ & subsequent albums. The way she is performing in her early 30s is not even subpar, and further cements her as a fad - the right product at the time that the market was favorable for it, but no lasting substance to keep it relevant.
No talent.
No acclaim.
No longevity.
No musical legacy.
Not a legend in the real world.
|
No talent is objectively false.
She's not acclaimed.
No longevity is objectively false
No musical legacy is also objectively false.
She experienced a drop after ITZ because of personal reasons, it wasn't a rejection of her as an artist or her music. Your post is rooted in hatred.
