Quote:
Originally posted by Lebanese Dude
Really?
Between:
1) Using a hyperbolic statement as "ABSOLUTELY NOTHING" when there's clear evidence otherwise
2) insisting that there was a crime in Benghazi when 11 separate investigations have shown otherwise
3) ironically dismissing Donald's accusers while trying to bring up Bill Clinton's in the same sentence
you've shown a clearly ignorant thought process.
If 18 months of heavy scrutiny haven't taught you anything, then no contribution from anyone here is likely to bring a change.
 |
Why didn't she defend herself against Trump's statement otherwise then?
Sources? Examples? I've heard otherwise and I find myself more likely to believe the other side.
Donald Trump apologised for any rude or derogatory stuff he might have said. The stuff with the women was brought up because the Clinton campaign was so desperate. Meanwhile, Bill Clinton was actually charged with rape and had a sex scandal and was nearly impeached for it. This is not equal.
You mean 18 months of anti-Trump propaganda? Trump is not perfect, but he's not a puppet of his campaign donators and billionaires as nearly all Democrats are.
