|
Celeb News: Taraji Henson exposes pay gap discrimination in Hollywood!
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 2,457
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ShouldersSideways
God, are y'all dense? You're completely missing her point. It isn't that she's complaining about making 100k. It's the fact that she got third billing in a MASSIVE film but because she's a black actress she was severely undercompensated.
No matter how you spin it - he's a bigger name, he was the lead actor, etc. - her making less than two percent of his pay is ABYSMAL.
|
Black women are treated like trash in hollywood, and she has every right to complain. I wonder if some of ya'll were making these same comments when Jennifer Lawrence complained.
Also all of ya'll that are complaining I hope ya'll go and see Hidden Figures.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/1/2010
Posts: 23,572
|
Quote:
Originally posted by elleventhirty
That's astounding. After taxes, the hotel expenses, and then having to pay her team (stylists, publicist, agents who get 10% off the bat, managers who usually get ~15%)... She basically got paid nothing. I can't believe people are actually trying to defend this as if she's wrong for speaking out. Of course she didn't expect to get paid Brad Pitt money, but at least 300K and freaking room and board (which is supposed to be on the budget) is what she deserved. They stiffed her and she didn't say anything because they could've easily gotten another black actress to do the job without complaint.
She was an established actress at this point. That was flat out discrimination. The fact that she had to pay her own way cements that.
|
Damn  I would be pissed
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 1,356
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Adelephant 25
You still making money I'm dreaming of making so be grateful that you get something 
|
Ikr.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 23,128
|
Having her pay for her own accommodations was messy
Quote:
Originally posted by AvrilLaQueen
I mean, how did she expect to earn the same amout of money with some A-level actor that is Brad Pitt? I 2008, her name didn't had that much impact that would get people pay money to see her in movies. When you're a Hollywood actor, you have to start from somewhere, and obviously that movie gave her that exposure and made her name respectable, and as more success she brings, the higher her price for a role costs. It's a simple math and the way business works in real life. That's why Beyonce's roles in movies cost more because her name brings money... that was until certain movie came out and the good sis wasn't getting those movie price tags anymore  .

|
Quote:
Originally posted by ShouldersSideways
A novel later you're still missing the point and trying to turn this into a stan war 
|

|
|
|
Member Since: 7/4/2007
Posts: 24,859
|
Quote:
Originally posted by cloudinthesky
I know.  I was speaking to your point that if JLaw had been in the same situation she wouldn't have settled for being paid less than her peers.
|
Did you miss the part where she was paid less than her peers for American Hustle?
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/20/2012
Posts: 5,523
|
Quote:
“There was one other thing: I’d have to agree to pay my own location fees while filming in New Orleans, meaning three months of hotel expenses would be coming directly out of my pocket. Insult, meet injury.”
|
That's just a slap in the face, tbh. Good thing, she's speaking up
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/15/2009
Posts: 23,385
|
She's not likeable though so?
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 368
|
The hypocrites in this thread.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/15/2011
Posts: 6,480
|
I don't think it's as cut and dry as "she's black and a woman so she was paid less" as some of y'all are making it out to be, but it's great she's exposing this. Third in the billing and she has to pay for own lodging? That's ****ing ridiculous... Maybe if it were some indie movie with a $2 mil budget, but the budget for this was like $200 million. Whoever made the money decisions on this movie needs to be called out and ridiculed.
I hope others start sharing similar details. Transparency in movie budgeting would be very beneficial in understanding and fixing the pay gap, not just with actors, but with technical crew as well.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 2,231
|
I don't think this has to do with her being black. If a working white actress were in her position, I believe the offer would have been similar to hers. I watched the movie in theaters and didn't know she was in it. She probably thought she was bigger than she really was.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/11/2012
Posts: 5,375
|
They should have never made her pay location fees, she is a talented actress.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 4,059
|
LOOLLOLOL what was she expecting? She wasn't no JLaw in 2008. Of couse she would bank much less than Brad and Cate who are already ICONIC Hollywood royalty.
Her paying for her own accomodation is TRAGIC tho 
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/22/2011
Posts: 55,626
|
Quote:
Originally posted by EnoughSaid
They should have never made her pay location fees, she is a talented actress.
|
I agree but not because she's a talented actress. I mean, if she were untalented her paying location fees wouldn't be cool either.
Either way, she was not known for many things outside of the urban community and this was a mainstream movie.
I don't think it is about her being black or female...
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/2/2011
Posts: 28,055
|
Yeah, because she wasn't a star at all at the time  Hollywood pay is based on star power. The film was a total ensemble piece outside of Brad and Cate.
She shouldn't be comparing her salary with Brad, but with Julia Ormond (who played the grown up daughter in present day). But that wouldn't fit her narrative or get her any press, and it's cool to bash Brad right now cause he's in the middle of a messy divorce. I mean, she's still getting paid SIX FIGURES for a couple months of work, but hey, this is some great injustice, right? Even though the other actors, both white and black, who had similar-sized roles probably got paid around the same.
Very transparent and disappointing move on Taraji's part.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 40,566
|
Quote:
Originally posted by slw84
I agree but not because she's a talented actress. I mean, if she were untalented her paying location fees wouldn't be cool either.
Either way, she was not known for many things outside of the urban community and this was a mainstream movie.
I don't think it is about her being black or female...
|
I thought ATRL only used this corny line for rappers/urban hits... no?
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/2/2011
Posts: 28,055
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ALA
I was about to say that I feel like she wasn't even in the film as much but that bit truly is f--ked up.
At least she got a Oscar nom.
|
The part about her hotel fees is definitely unfair but it's not because she's a woman. I know how the industry works and that's because studios are cheap as **** and don't care about you if you're not their big star of the film. It happens to men, women, black, white, everyone. Being an actor in Hollywood is so ludicrously cuthroat and competitive, even Taraji with her 2% of Brad Pitt's salary in a film like Benjamin Button is still 0.1% of working actors and what most people would only dream of. It's the unfair reality of that industry, but being an actor is already a pretty unrealistic, risky career.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/2/2011
Posts: 28,055
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MusicTalker
Who gives a **** how much she made. The point is she made much less than her peers, which does NEED to be addressed.
|
Her peers in that film were Julia Osmond and Tilda Swinton, other actors with supporting roles, NOT Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett, who were the LEADS.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/2/2011
Posts: 28,055
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ShouldersSideways
God, are y'all dense? You're completely missing her point. It isn't that she's complaining about making 100k. It's the fact that she got third billing in a MASSIVE film but because she's a black actress she was severely undercompensated.
No matter how you spin it - he's a bigger name, he was the lead actor, etc. - her making less than two percent of his pay is ABYSMAL.
|
It's not, it's economics. Brad Pitt's presence in that film made it a commercial success, ensured its profitability, and if he or a similar actor hadn't signed on the film would have never been made. His presence was absolutely essential to the existence and the success of the project. Taraji, just like Tilda or Julia or any of the other supporting cast, could have been replaced by any actress and it wouldn't have made a difference in terms of the film's performance. It's like a CEO who has the vision and experience and connections to make a business boom vs a random middle manager who may be excellent at their job, but can be replaced by anyone and the bottom line will be the same. 2% sounds tough but that's how the world works. It makes sense financially.
The part about this that's truly objectionable is the fact that they made her pay for her accommodations. That's just studios being cheap and mistreating their actors.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/30/2012
Posts: 19,226
|
Pretty ridiculous to compare her salary to that of top A list actors. Also, fire your agent if he can't negotiate you a satisfactory deal.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 7,846
|
ngl i read
Quote:
Taraji Henson exposes gay pay
|
|
|
|
|
|