Mte, there's no way the New York Times of all papers would go through with this without having vetted their story. I just watched a PBS doc that said that Trump learned to counter-sue explicitly as a means of intimidation even when he's guilty

Remember when he said Hillary got schlonged and we all thought that was terrible and could end his campaign?

lol

"By the way, the two really, really bad stories I mentioned would soon be dropping still haven't actually dropped."

https://twitter.com/LizMair/status/786418574394920960

https://twitter.com/ajjaffe/status/786423522167971840

I read that suing NYT could open the door for them to do an investigation into Trump. Only con is that we won't know till after the election

Some Congress people in swing areas. I can't remember the states tho.

@ajjaffe Victory should be in quotes.

https://twitter.com/KellyannePolls/s...69953700171776

The levels of irony in this tweet now

I agree.

After what happened to Dan Rather and Mary Mapes in the 2004 election, I really don't think that any publication would put out an election story that wasn't ironclad.

Discovery. They'll probaby move for dismissal though.

they never really had a shot there anyways

besides, they have to focus on the important swing states of utah and arizona now.

Makes me wonder how involved the Clintons were in all these new developments

So basically the race is over because if she wins just one she passes 270

****ing blowout.

If she holds PA then this is over LOL

Hmmhm. I agree.

This is not a lawsuit. This is complaining under letterhead. https://t.co/y5GfdRzYHC

How can I go to bed amidst all of this excitement?!!