That doesnt make them trendy nor hitmakers
That makes them one hit wonders
Maybe Ronson isn't because he has other known songs (which aren't smashes).. but really Uptown Funk was a smash mostly because of Bruno!
Quote:
Originally posted by Bribe
Right? Mark Ronson and Bloodpop having 1 hit each doesn't make them "trendy". Trendy would be like when everyone ran to Timbaland in 2006-2008 for a hit song.
Quote:
Originally posted by MonsterNavy
IKR
Also its not like Perfect Illusion sounds like Uptown Funk or Sorry
Its a complete 360 from those songs actually
If she was hopping on the "trend" then PI wouldve sounded like Uptown Funk or Sorry easily
Doesn't change the fact that she worked with people that would have easily granted a hit to anyone else that doesn't believe there's artistic value in self-sabotage.
Continue to pretend that she's not a pop star and that she's performing in line with expectations, though.
Dead at Katy Kats celebrating this Katy only did 37k more when her last lead single debuted with 550k (or more). Gaga last least single debuted with 200k (a bit more maybe)... PRISM was way more successful era than ARTPOP, of course Rise would open with bigger numbers (it had a WAY bigger promo too)
Dead at Katy Kats celebrating this Katy only did 37k more when her last lead single debuted with 550k (or more). Gaga last least single debuted with 200k (a bit more maybe)... PRISM was way more successful era than ARTPOP, of course Rise would open with bigger numbers (it had a WAY bigger promo too)
Dead at Katy Kats celebrating this Katy only did 37k more when her last lead single debuted with 550k (or more). Gaga last least single debuted with 200k (a bit more maybe)... PRISM was way more successful era than ARTPOP, of course Rise would open with bigger numbers (it had a WAY bigger promo too)
Katy's decline is way bigger than Gaga's.
Except Katy didn't promote the song at all because it wasn't a lead single. Not sure what "a WAY bigger promo" you're referring to.
Dead at Katy Kats celebrating this Katy only did 37k more when her last lead single debuted with 550k (or more). Gaga last least single debuted with 200k (a bit more maybe)... PRISM was way more successful era than ARTPOP, of course Rise would open with bigger numbers (it had a WAY bigger promo too)
I expected this, I'm a monster but I'm not delusional lmao...she's nowhere near the popularity she was in 2010/2011 so after a 3 year gap after an underwhelming era (ARTPOP) she was bound to have lower figures than Beyonce, Rihanna etc who are dominating the scene right now.
If Gaga's other singles are more 'GP friendly' and the album is good she could easily retain her force in the pop scene, maybe not as big as her HUGE debut, but get on the level of say Beyonce etc. Especially if she does the superbowl next year.
We can't just expect her to smash after so long out the game, most young teens don't even rate Gaga tbh...and even though I personally love the song, it is very polarising, some love it & some hate it - not the best lead single choice.
Except Katy didn't promote the song at all because it wasn't a lead single. Not sure what "a WAY bigger promo" you're referring to.
probably premiering the Olympics video on NBC's today show + giving an interview, having all 3 banners and exclusivity on AM/Itunes which makes it possible for more sales digitally than streams (since it's not available on Spotify and other platforms).
PI had 1 radio interview in the US as promo and nothing else
Dead at Katy Kats celebrating this Katy only did 37k more when her last lead single debuted with 550k (or more). Gaga last least single debuted with 200k (a bit more maybe)... PRISM was way more successful era than ARTPOP, of course Rise would open with bigger numbers (it had a WAY bigger promo too)
Katy's decline is way bigger than Gaga's.
So, according to you, Katy was more successful than Gaga then, is more successful now, and somehow, that's a bad thing for Katy?