They sample size consisted of 144 queer men. The average age was 27. Eighty-four percent identified as gay, 13% as bisexual, and 3% identified as other (pansexual, polysexual, straight).
Here are the results. The men with ******** real men only type profiles were thought to be significantly less intelligent, significantly less sexually confident, and significantly less dateable. In essence, they’re not the brightest, not great in bed, and not suitable partners. Or even more specifically, they suck.
There was one group of men, however, who actually liked these profiles, not thinking the masc only men were the absolute worst. As you might guess, they were the other men who held anti-effeminate views. *Cue major eye roll*
Those are the worst types of men. They can't even answer the question of "what is masc to you?"
Like, don't expect me to be able to tell you if I'm masc or not if you can't give me the parameters you seek. To me, I am masc but to somebody else I could be a flaming queen.
Bros for bros gays can stay alone wondering why they're alone
Sounds like a pressed bottom wrote this.
