If anything, I find "anti-sjw" to be more rational and willing to discuss issues, while "sjw" just seem to yell and attack the other person personally, and not attack their argument which they should be doing.
. Most of the anti-sjws are not bullies that are looking for justification to be bullies on the account of real issues.
Anti-SJW's are just the worst, imo. Sure, SJW's can go too hard and get some things completely wrong some times. But the mere fact that anti-sjw's don't realize they're doing the EXACT SAME THING SJW's are doing by monitoring others peoples' behavior and telling them how to act is just mind-numbing. The whole mindset of being offended by other people being offended is just kinda stupid.
Most of the times I don't really agree with anyone because things aren't as black and white as everyone makes them out to be. But I agree with SJW's WAY more often than their opposition (which is never).
Both extremes are bad but I think Anti-SJWs are worse because they also label people 'SJWs' who aren't.
Quote:
Originally posted by NoMythologies
Anti-SJW's are just the worst, imo. Sure, SJW's can go too hard and get some things completely wrong some times. But the mere fact that anti-sjw's don't realize they're doing the EXACT SAME THING SJW's are doing by monitoring others peoples' behavior and telling them how to act is just mind-numbing. The whole mindset of being offended by other people being offended is just kinda stupid.
Most of the times I don't really agree with anyone because things aren't as black and white as everyone makes them out to be. But I agree with SJW's WAY more often than their opposition (which is never).
SJW who get offended by "microaggresion" and anti-SJWs who aren't infact anti-SJW, just conservatives are equally awful.
I wouldn't call people on the right-wing as "anti-SJWs" because they are just conservatives in general, just left-wing or liberals who are going against ultra left-wing SJWs.
