Is he an anti vaxxer too? Anyway Trump thanks them for their work to make him President
He has not expressed public opinion on that, but he has always opposed the death penalty, fracking, TPP and the invasion of Iraq. I think she picked him because he's consistent with what the left is demanding.
Is he an anti vaxxer too? Anyway Trump thanks them for their work to make him President
The nerve. Democrats this election cycle are just as bad as Republicans when it comes to smears and lies. Jill is not anti vaccinations. She is a fricking Medical doctor with two degrees from Harvard.
The nerve. Democrats this election cycle are just as bad as Republicans when it comes to smears and lies. Jill is not anti vaccinations. She is a fricking Medical doctor with two degrees from Harvard.
She still plays to her followers though. I don't believe she is, but even going back just one week she validated that movement by saying there are legitimate questions to be asked - which is a dangerous statement to make.
You can watch her playing to that crowd when she randomly pulls out thar Wi-Fi (at around 1:00) could be damaging to the brains of children and action will only be done when who knows how many die. These positions and her public stance on GMOs make her an anti-science candidate no matter what her title is (again even if I don't believe she thinks these things, she knows her audience.)
The nerve. Democrats this election cycle are just as bad as Republicans when it comes to smears and lies. Jill is not anti vaccinations. She is a fricking Medical doctor with two degrees from Harvard.
Which makes her positions against science on multiple fronts even more blasphemous.
Congrats! At first I was upset about Jill Stein and her shameless pandering, but now I'm fine. When Hillary becomes president, those Jill Stein voters shouldn't expect anything or complain, because they are not part of our party.
The nerve. Democrats this election cycle are just as bad as Republicans when it comes to smears and lies. Jill is not anti vaccinations. She is a fricking Medical doctor with two degrees from Harvard.
So? Idk if she's anti-vaccination or not, but two degrees from Harvard means squat. Ben Carson is one of the most respected neurosurgeons and we all heard the non sense that he spewed when he was running
The nerve. Democrats this election cycle are just as bad as Republicans when it comes to smears and lies. Jill is not anti vaccinations. She is a fricking Medical doctor with two degrees from Harvard.
Ben Carson was a brain surgeon and he's a certified loon ; education doesn't replace good/common sense sis
3rd party voters in general only tend to do so to soothe their precious egos and vindicate themselves from 'corruption!!!!1!!1' then don't vote at all sis , every damn politician is corrupt , it's all a scam and we're meant to choose between the least dangerous / most authentic scammer the sooner y'all let go of these silly pipe dreams that Gary Johnson or Jill Stein have any chance of winning as a 3rd party candidate , the sooner we can stop talking about Trump and potentially shift the focus onto revitalizing politicians in general , but it's not happening this election and y'all are so. damn. foolish. to hold out hope for these birds
He has not expressed public opinion on that, but he has always opposed the death penalty, fracking, TPP and the invasion of Iraq. I think she picked him because he's consistent with what the left is demanding.
Well I disagree with most of his views already so that makes the decision even easier than it already was
The nerve. Democrats this election cycle are just as bad as Republicans when it comes to smears and lies. Jill is not anti vaccinations. She is a fricking Medical doctor with two degrees from Harvard.
They are not even close to the republicans this cycle, and countless political outlets have compared to the two and come to the same conclusion.
LMAO at people mad at her or being rude. THIS is democracy. She has every right to run for POTUS. She's not taking votes from Hillary, let alone anyone - a candidate can't take votes from others, they lose votes to others. I don't see the similar outrage at Johnson.
LMAO at people mad at her or being rude. THIS is democracy. She has every right to run for POTUS. She's not taking votes from Hillary, let alone anyone - a candidate can't take votes from others, they lose votes to others. I don't see the similar outrage at Johnson.
Except she literally is. We live in a sh*tty two-party system and someone not falling to one side only helps the other. These Green Party losers don't even care about attaining political office, they just want publicity. If they actually cared about their cause, they'd start from the ground up with local and city-wide elections, not the biggest power position in the free world when anyone with a brain knows that they'll never be able to get enough delegates to win.
No one has posted any evidence on her being against vaccines, yet.
Quote:
Originally posted by Beyonnaise
Except she literally is. We live in a sh*tty two-party system and someone not falling to one side only helps the other. These Green Party losers don't even care about attaining political office, they just want publicity. If they actually cared about their cause, they'd start from the ground up with local and city-wide elections, not the biggest power position in the free world when anyone with a brain knows that they'll never be able to get enough delegates to win.
But that's how it works in the US. We don't have a true democracy, we have the electoral college. And a third party taking votes from a better qualified candidate has already happened in recent history, you can read and educate yourself here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_...campaign,_2000
These positions and her public stance on GMOs make her an anti-science candidate no matter what her title is (again even if I don't believe she thinks these things, she knows her audience.)