|
Discussion: Bitch I’m Madonna sets records
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 1,144
|
^
Janets videos dont have alot of views either... It doesn't mean there not iconic. Same goes for Madonna.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 2,457
|
Quote:
Originally posted by C.Damen
Invincible did NOT sell 8 million worldwide. Can you do a sales breakdown, please?
Since you love ignoring my requests, I am going to start ignoring whatever you say to try and boost up your beloved King. And you hit the nail right on the head: "50 million since he DIED". Thanks for proving my point.
I am not searching on Google for anything. I have mentioned before that Madonna's videos on YouTube are not available in countries all around the world but you seem to not grasp that.
This thread is about BIM reaching 200 million views and NOT about Michael Jackson.
And to close this off, what MJ music videos this decade reached 200 million?
|
No it hasn't sold 8 million worldwide. Various sources, including Sony, have it listed around 13 million and the minimum estimate is at around 7 million (ukmix). These sales, considering it pretty much wasn't promoted at all, was sabatoged by Sony, and only had one top 10 hit (albeit only three singles were realeased) are pretty impressive. I'm curious as to how you are oh so positive it hasn't sold 8 million when you haven't seemed to post any sources yourself, just opinions.
Secondly, how do you have the nerve to say Love Never Felt So Good only reached Vevo certified status because of Justin Timberlake but go on to give Madonna props for having BIM reach 200m even though it featured Nicki Minaj and had a plethora of celebrities including VARIOUS younger and current pop girls? How sway? And even then BIM only peaked in the mid-80s I believe while LNFSG peaked at #9.
Also there are plenty of non-Vevo 70s/80s and even some 90s videos (that also aren't available in numerous countries) that are on youtube and still have a significant amount of views. I'm talking at least 50m+. A lot of which were also uploaded later than her videos too. Just because many of her's don't isn't an excuse.
Lastly, his catalog was still outselling hers even before he died. Just go look at any chart from the 2000s. I can find numerous times in which Number Ones or The Essential Michael Jackson, were still charting. Hell I even remember seeing he was one of the top selling artists on BB in 2008. Meanwhile it The Immaculate Collection was realased in hadn't re-charted on the BB200 until at least 2 or 3 years ago and that was only one time. MJ regulary has 4 or 5 albums on the BB200 at any given time. Also his streaming to this day leads her's by a significant magin.
I'll end this by saying, what Madonna video, that isn't BIM, has managed to collect over 100m views? What songs of her's on spotify have managed to collect over 100m+ streams on spotify? Which of her pre-2010 studio albums of her's have re-charted on the BB200 this decade?
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 15,921
|
Quote:
Originally posted by C.Damen
Can the MJ fans please leave this thread?
Even after 2009, your fave is still being accused of molesting people.
Like take whatever dignity you have left and just leave this thread.
This thread is not about children, it's about Madonna's video reaching 200 million views.
|

|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 15,921
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Misanthrope
Your delusion is unreal.
Its not a hit in any club, even the lamest gay clubs. at least not beyond its release era. ive personally never even heard it outside of the internet.
its a "signature" track to her delusional stans only. it was/is completely irrelevant outside of her hive.
|
then why did it chart #1 on Billboard Club charts? 
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 2,457
|
[
Quote:
Originally posted by C.Damen
To start off with, I just find it amazing that you are allowed to make excuses for Invincible not performing up to standards. But when Madonna doesn’t have a video from the 80s or 90s despite being banned in countries, she’s not allowed to have any excuses. You are just clearly showing your bias and therefore there is no reason to even debate with you period. Not to mention I have specifically asked for a breakdown of Invincible and you keep on telling me Sony this and UKmix that. I don’t know where Sony plucked that number from but based on chart runs for Invincible, how on Earth could it have reached 13 million? I don’t need to post any sources because I have asked over and over for a sales breakdown and posts later I still have NOT gotten one. Therefore this is a dead argument and does not add anything at all to this thread which is about BIM reaching 200 million views.
|
Belittling Madonna? So what is this?
Quote:
Outselling her? By what? Like 400k or something? His latest posthumous album FLOPPED hard.
|
Fact: Madonna's album just now crossed the 1m mark and if it hasn't is still sitting at around 900k. Xscape has sold anywhere from 1.7m to 2m.
Quote:
Talent and longevity won? It doesn't take talent to have to DIE to get people to buy your records.
|
This is just so idiotic and juevenile i'm not going to waste my time collecting the recipets to ether it. I will say that Thriller was still the best selling album of all time before he died and i'm going to leave it at that.
Quote:
Takes talent to discount your record to $5.99 on ITunes, right?
|
Fact: ALL POP ALBUMS ARE DISCOUNTED ON ITUNES RIGHT NOW, INCLUDING MADONNA'S. I see Michael's Number Ones resting at #22 and Thriller sitting at #59. Madonna's are no where to be found here in US itunes, at least it the top 150.
Quote:
It's funny how MJ's recent music in the 2010s don't even hold a candle to his 80s and 90s stuff. How many views does Slave to the Rhythm have?
|
Fact: More than both Ghosttown and LFL. Also charted higher than Ghosttown, LFL, and BIM.
Quote:
Just face it. MJ has been over since 2001 and no amount of facts in this thread will prove otherwise. You are NOT going to tell me otherwise.
|
Fixed that for you.
Quote:
Oh and I will need the IFPI link. I tried searching for it but nothing came up. Maybe you can find it instead.
|
https://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=110645
https://www.bpi.co.uk/home/british-a...sic-sales.aspx
If you don't mind me asking could you give me the link and sales breakdown for Rebel Heart if you don't mind  .
Little boy this is moreso you and your lack or ability to form a legitamate argument and comparison without calling those facts brought against you as "excuses." The fact is Invincible was deliberately sabatoged by Sony and was extremely underpromoted. The fact is numerous videos from the 70s/80/90s aren't on Vevo and aren't available in all countries yet have still been able to cross the 50m and in some cases the 100m benchmark. if they could do it then surely Madonna should have been able to.
Also if your going to make ludicrus claims like MJ has been over since 2001 why can't you take the time to research your own facts to back that up? Are you that lazy? But anyway here it is
Sony
http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthr...he-King-Of-POP
Ukmix (hasn't been updated since 2009 so it's probably more than this)
https://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=63110
Quote:
Where do you see me giving her props for reaching 200 million? I honestly don’t give a **** about ANY video reaching 200 million. Why? What does that person get? What does Madonna get for having a video be viewed on YouTube 200 million times? Does she get some kind of medal or something? Please enlighten me and let me know. At the end of the day, both Madonna and Michael Jackson had celebrities included in their videos that reached over 200 million. Therefore this is a dead argument and does not add anything at all to this thread which is about BIM reaching 200 million views.
|
Why are did you start belittiling Michael then? What does that have to do with BIM surpassing 200m views? Why are you in this thread? Why are you here if you don't care about any video hitting the 100m or 200m mark? You should ask the majority of these questions to the OP who made up this so called "achievement" in the first place, more than likely out of insecurity and a need for validation from other stans. And no little boy. Deceased Michael had one other celebrity in his video while Madonna had at least 7 or 8 different celebrities in her's. And also on Michael's videos that actually have 200m+ views no other celebrities are present.
Quote:
Good for them. I would ask you some examples of course but that will be like telling a baby to learn how to read and write so therefore I would not ask. So here you are clearly showing that Madonna should not have any excuses as to why her videos don’t have a significant amount of views, meanwhile making excuses as to why Invincible did not perform up to standards. Therefore this is a dead argument and does not add anything at all to this thread which is about BIM reaching 200 million views.
|
Like I said these are two completely different situations child. The only reason you are downplaying the fact that Invincible's underpromotion played a part in it's underperformance and that Madonna not having a Vevo account or her videos available in all countries is because it doesn't work it in her favor. "Excuses" and facts are two different things. Learn the difference.
Quote:
You keep on repeating the same thing over and over. “Look at this chart from so and so”. “Look at that chart from this year”. You keep saying look at this and look at that and still do not provide links to ANYTHING at all. In 2012, a couple of Madonna albums were charting on the Billboard 200. I forgot which ones they were (I think one was True Blue and another was Celebration). Also, Immaculate Collection has charted a couple more times not ONLY one time. It charted this year in 2016. But what does that matter? What does anyone’s catalog sales have to do with a thread about a music video reaching 200 million views? But more than likely you will not answer this question; you will keep continuing to even grasp for more straws to try and bring up Michael Jackson and belittle Madonna. Therefore this is a dead argument and does not add anything at all to this thread which is about BIM reaching 200 million views.
|
http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=509271
If you don't want to talk about catalog sales, streaming, and views then why did you say Michael has been over since 2001? Why say something so stupid and then get mad when you get facts thrown in your face? You have done nothing but accentuate that Michael was a pedophile, attribute all of his post-death accomplishments to mere sympathy (even though he dies a whole 7 years ago), and put him down to boost Madonna up when the stats explicitly state quite the opposite. You should be the last person trying to accuse someone of belittiling an artist.
Quote:
Let me end this by asking: Why do you care so much? Why do you care which videos of her managed to collect over 100 million views? Clearly you do not care for her as an artist, so why are you asking? Why are you asking which albums of her re-charted this decade? Clearly you have not purchased them, so why do you care so much?
If you have nothing else to add to this conversation, by all means leave this thread and go find something more valuable to do with your time. If a thread on ATRL gets you so hot and bothered, then you should not be here. I am not going to waste my time checking which albums charted where, which songs reached this amount of views, which song received this amount of free plays on Spotify. I don’t care at all and quite frankly neither should you. Again, I do not CARE at all whose album charted where on this chart. I don’t care which video received this amount of views. Does that change the impact that Madonna and Michael Jackson have created? Does it?
|
QUOTE=C.Damen;35339425]
For the upteenth time, why did you say that Michael has been over since 2001 and people only buy his records out of sympathy if you weren't going to back it up? Why say something so stupid and no even look to see if your fave surpasses him in anything (catalog sales, re-charting, video views, streaming, none of which she does)? Why are you back tracking? If you don't care to even research and look for simple reciepts why make such stupid claims? I'm signed up here to defend my fave like everyone else and if you don't like it you can kindly put me on ignore. I'm suprised you actually acknowledge that Michael has impact since you've done nothing but act like an immature child regarding him this entire thread. Now you want to acknowledge him and impact now that you can't defend your argument.
Let this be a learning experience and if you don't want to argue about Michael or Madonna, keep her's and especially his name out of your mouth.
http://vh1.mtvnimages.com/uri/mgid:f...1430255143.gif
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 2,816
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Belittling Madonna? So what is this?
|
Yes you have been belittling Madonna since you came to this forum and to me that’s so sad. And trust me as you read further on you will see what I am talking about.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Fact: Madonna's album just now crossed the 1m mark and if it hasn't is still sitting at around 900k. Xscape has sold anywhere from 1.7m to 2m.
|
Based on that UKMIX link you sent me, it appears that Xscape has “sold” 1.7M which also includes SPS. So with that being said, if we include Madonna’s Rebel Heart sales of 1 MIL plus her streaming, what does that add up to? Like 1.1 or 1.2M or something like that? Whichever it is, it is not that drastic of a difference between both albums despite being released months from each other. And that is exactly why I stated “By what? Like 400k or SOMETHING”, meaning it’s not that huge of a margin.
Let me also elaborate even further. The user OffTheWall has stated that Madonna’s last three studio efforts have “flopped” correct? Hard Candy sold roughly 4 million. MDNA has sold around 2 million. Rebel Heart has sold a little over a million. If these are considered to have “flopped” according to OffTheWall, then by all means Xscape is a flop too, correct? I mean it has sold 1.7M, correct? Therefore it’s a FLOP. As I mentioned previously my statement of “His latest posthumous album FLOPPED hard” stands correct then.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
This is just so idiotic and juevenile i'm not going to waste my time collecting the recipets to ether it. I will say that Thriller was still the best selling album of all time before he died and i'm going to leave it at that.
|
Good. I mean we don’t need any more unnecessary and boring comparisons, right? You are correct in saying Thriller is the best selling album of all time before and after MJ passed away. With that being said, it adds nothing new to this thread which as I mentioned millions of times is about BIM passing 200M in YouTube views.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Fact: ALL POP ALBUMS ARE DISCOUNTED ON ITUNES RIGHT NOW, INCLUDING MADONNA'S. I see Michael's Number Ones resting at #22 and Thriller sitting at #59. Madonna's are no where to be found here in US itunes, at least it the top 150.
|
Fact: The Immaculate Collection is $12.99 and Thriller is $5.99. Number Ones is also $5.99.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Fact: More than both Ghosttown and LFL. Also charted higher than Ghosttown, LFL, and BIM.
|
That’s correct. But earlier you mentioned that NON-VEVO videos from the 80s and 70s still have a significant amount of views, correct? At least 50M plus, right? So why hasn’t Slave to the Rhythm scraped at least 50 million views since MJ is the King of the World? Can you please offer an explanation and then I will see if it’s acceptable. This is unacceptable for MJ’s standards. I mean it’s supposed to have at least 750 million views because he is the Creator of the Universe, right?
So you’re also saying it charted higher. It peaked at number 45 on the Hot 100. Hate to break it to you but that’s called an underperformance. As a matter of fact anything outside of the top 15 is considered an underperformance. So BIM can chart at number 44 on the Hot 100. Doesn’t mean that it’s a bigger “hit”. It’s STILL an underperformance like STTR. Understand?
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
If you don't mind me asking could you give me the link and sales breakdown for Rebel Heart if you don't mind  .
|
For what? No one ever mentioned Rebel Heart did astronomical numbers. Unless someone in here did?
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Little boy this is moreso you and your lack or ability to form a legitamate argument and comparison without calling those facts brought against you as "excuses." The fact is Invincible was deliberately sabatoged by Sony and was extremely underpromoted. The fact is numerous videos from the 70s/80/90s aren't on Vevo and aren't available in all countries yet have still been able to cross the 50m and in some cases the 100m benchmark. if they could do it then surely Madonna should have been able to.
|
Little boy? Really, now? How old are you? 40? There is no argument or comparison at all because you keep going backwards and digging a deeper whole for yourself. And like I predicted I asked specifically for some videos and you continue to ignore it. With that being said, what are you implying about Madonna not reaching 50M or 100M in her 80s and 90s video views? Because if you are implying what I think you are, I have a great counter argument for you.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Also if your going to make ludicrus claims like MJ has been over since 2001 why can't you take the time to research your own facts to back that up? Are you that lazy? But anyway here it is
|
According to UKMIX, Invincible is listed as around 5 million which sounds 100 times more reasonable. With that being said, I don’t know where you or Sony are plucking 13 million from. It also proves my point that Invincible has NOT sold 8 million worldwide and despite not being updated for years, I doubt Invincible has sold millions of copies throughout the years. Thanks for proving my point.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Why are did you start belittiling Michael then? What does that have to do with BIM surpassing 200m views? Why are you in this thread? Why are you here if you don't care about any video hitting the 100m or 200m mark? You should ask the majority of these questions to the OP who made up this so called "achievement" in the first place, more than likely out of insecurity and a need for validation from other stans. And no little boy. Deceased Michael had one other celebrity in his video while Madonna had at least 7 or 8 different celebrities in her's. And also on Michael's videos that actually have 200m+ views no other celebrities are present.
|
Well you can ask the user Pickachoo why he brought up Michael Jackson to begin with. Then you can blame the user OffTheWall for making it worse and bringing up sales and streams. The OP clearly just stated a fact that an artist from the 80s, THIS decade, has a video reach 200 million views. Nothing more and nothing less. I find it hilarious that you think only Madonna fans do this when nearly EVERY stan base does this. Have you seen the threads DMF has made? I don’t think Madonna needs validation from other stans because I think her achievements speak for themselves; the same way Michael’s achievements speak for themselves. Of course his other videos have no other celebrities because those are his 80s and 90s stuff.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Like I said these are two completely different situations child. The only reason you are downplaying the fact that Invincible's underpromotion played a part in it's underperformance and that Madonna not having a Vevo account or her videos available in all countries is because it doesn't work it in her favor. "Excuses" and facts are two different things. Learn the difference.
|
Right and the fact that you are downplaying Madonna’s not having a VEVO account or her videos available in all countries because it doesn’t work in Michael’s favor. It’s a two way street, buddy. Can’t have your cake and eat it too. I KNOW the difference between both terms and a FACT is that Madonna’s videos ARE NOT on her VEVO and ARE BANNED in countries. Glad we settled that.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
If you don't want to talk about catalog sales, streaming, and views then why did you say Michael has been over since 2001? Why say something so stupid and then get mad when you get facts thrown in your face? You have done nothing but accentuate that Michael was a pedophile, attribute all of his post-death accomplishments to mere sympathy (even though he dies a whole 7 years ago), and put him down to boost Madonna up when the stats explicitly state quite the opposite. You should be the last person trying to accuse someone of belittiling an artist.
|
Let me add a little something over here:
http://www.billboard.com/charts/bill...200/2016-02-06
If you click the link above, we can clearly see the Immaculate Collection charting at number 49 on the Billboard 200 and this was this year in 2016. The link you provided showed the album charting in 2014. Therefore, you were wrong in saying the Immaculate Collection only charted ONCE in the past couple of years. Clearly it has charted multiple times and therefore your statement was proven wrong based on the evidence me and you provided. Verdict in my favor.
Michael has been over since 2001 because he had nothing new to offer since then. I mean he kept releasing greatest hits, box collections, re-releases and etc. He has NOTHING new and more importantly nothing GOOD to offer. That is primarily why I said both of his recent posthumous albums flopped tremendously. The music was just not cutting it. From an artist standpoint he had nothing left to offer and therefore has been over since. He gets most of his recognition from his 80s and 90s stuff. Is that a bad thing? Absolutely not. But it’s the cold hard truth.
Let’s not mention during 2001 til present, he has been accused of being a child molester, hung his youngest baby out the window, did some documentary with Martin Bashir that tried to paint him in a bad light, and unfortunately passed away in 2009. That’s exactly why I have been saying he has been over as an artist.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
For the upteenth time, why did you say that Michael has been over since 2001 and people only buy his records out of sympathy if you weren't going to back it up? Why say something so stupid and no even look to see if your fave surpasses him in anything (catalog sales, re-charting, video views, streaming, none of which she does)? Why are you back tracking? If you don't care to even research and look for simple reciepts why make such stupid claims? I'm signed up here to defend my fave like everyone else and if you don't like it you can kindly put me on ignore. I'm suprised you actually acknowledge that Michael has impact since you've done nothing but act like an immature child regarding him this entire thread. Now you want to acknowledge him and impact now that you can't defend your argument.
Let this be a learning experience and if you don't want to argue about Michael or Madonna, keep her's and especially his name out of your mouth.
http://vh1.mtvnimages.com/uri/mgid:f...1430255143.gif
|
I have answered your question already. You don’t seem to want to answer mine but continuously spout more and more repeated nonsense just because a music video of Madonna reached 200M views. Are you saying Madonna has to surpass MJ in something in order for me to appreciate her as an artist? What kind of first grade mentality is that? Buddy, I am not back tracking anything at all.
So let me get this straight, you signed up for ATRL to defend Michael Jackson?! LMAO! Are you serious? Is that your ultimate life goal or something? To defend Michael Jackson every chance you get? There are MILLIONS of people who slander Michael Jackson. Why are you not defending him to them? Buddy, I don’t have to put you or anyone on ignore. I’m good. And I have been a fan of MJ since I was eight years old. You don’t know me, ok? You know nothing about me okay? With that being said, keep your ignorant comments to yourself and quit talking about belittling Michael Jackson when all you do is belittle Madonna ever since you got here.
Need proof?
http://atrl.net/?p=31069537
http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=862766&page=2
http://atrl.net/?p=29260578
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 2,816
|
Let me also add I am not going to continue to spam and flood this thread with useless and pointless arguments.
If you want to debate, come on my wall or PM me because this is ridiculous and embarrassing.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 2,717
|
I'm not reading none of this **** in here.
I just came to say: Bey ha power!!

|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 2,457
|
Quote:
Originally posted by C.Damen
]Yes you have been belittling Madonna since you came to this forum and to me that’s so sad. And trust me as you read further on you will see what I am talking about.[/CENTER]
|
You at this point
https://cdn1.lockerdome.com/uploads/...9bf5_:original
You have the nerve to say your a Michael fan for the sake of saving yourself in this argument but you call him a pedophile, reduce his accomplishments to people feeling sorry for his death, and downplay him to uplift Madonna, not just on here but as I have too been looking through your posting history it seems you do that whenever he is brought up. That's just sorry and pathetic.
Quote:
Based on that UKMIX link you sent me, it appears that Xscape has “sold” 1.7M which also includes SPS. So with that being said, if we include Madonna’s Rebel Heart sales of 1 MIL plus her streaming, what does that add up to? Like 1.1 or 1.2M or something like that? Whichever it is, it is not that drastic of a difference between both albums despite being released months from each other. And that is exactly why I stated “By what? Like 400k or SOMETHING”, meaning it’s not that huge of a margin.
Let me also elaborate even further. The user OffTheWall has stated that Madonna’s last three studio efforts have “flopped” correct? Hard Candy sold roughly 4 million. MDNA has sold around 2 million. Rebel Heart has sold a little over a million. If these are considered to have “flopped” according to OffTheWall, then by all means Xscape is a flop too, correct? I mean it has sold 1.7M, correct? Therefore it’s a FLOP. As I mentioned previously my statement of “His latest posthumous album FLOPPED hard” stands correct then.
|
Like I said if you're going to press me on and on about Michael's poshthomous sales then give me the breakdown of Rebel Heart's since you are so dead set at it selling over 1 million copies. And honey when you add this all up, which you don't seem to be that efficient at doing, the difference is still anywhere from 600k to 1M, with SPS added or not. And also in today's sales climate, be it 400k, 600k, or 1m, those are all significant margins.
Offthewall pointed out the fault in your logic, which are far and few between. Hard Candy was realeased in 2008, completely different sales climate, and supported with the highest grossing world tour by a solo artist of all time. MDNA was promoted with selling free tickets with the album, the FREAKING SUPERBOWL, the promo to end all promo, and another world tour. Xscape had none of this and still managed to sell 1.7m, from the grave. If Xscape is a flop then MDNA and Rebel Heart must be the absolute pits. The standards and playing field are not the same comparing the albums. Your logic and inability to make a valid comparison is truly astounding.
Quote:
Good. I mean we don’t need any more unnecessary and boring comparisons, right? You are correct in saying Thriller is the best selling album of all time before and after MJ passed away. With that being said, it adds nothing new to this thread which as I mentioned millions of times is about BIM passing 200M in YouTube views.
|
Yup is just proves your ignorance for insinuating that MJ's records only sold because he died. Also what has the majority of what you have said in this thread have to do with BIM passing 200m. What did you calling Michael a pedophile, saying he's been over since 2001, bringing up his sales and posthumous albums have to do with her so called record? Pot calling the kettle black if i've ever seen it.
Quote:
Fact: The Immaculate Collection is $12.99 and Thriller is $5.99. Number Ones is also $5.99.
|
Confessions On A Dance Floor: $5.99
MDNA: $5.99
Even aside from itunes The Essential by Michael Jackson is $16.99 and still has no problem charting. Off The Wall is $9.99, the same price as the majority of Madonna's albums, and is still on the BB200 to this day. Your point is invalid.
Quote:
That’s correct. But earlier you mentioned that NON-VEVO videos from the 80s and 70s still have a significant amount of views, correct? At least 50M plus, right? So why hasn’t Slave to the Rhythm scraped at least 50 million views since MJ is the King of the World? Can you please offer an explanation and then I will see if it’s acceptable. This is unacceptable for MJ’s standards. I mean it’s supposed to have at least 750 million views because he is the Creator of the Universe, right?
So you’re also saying it charted higher. It peaked at number 45 on the Hot 100. Hate to break it to you but that’s called an underperformance. As a matter of fact anything outside of the top 15 is considered an underperformance. So BIM can chart at number 44 on the Hot 100. Doesn’t mean that it’s a bigger “hit”. It’s STILL an underperformance like STTR. Understand?
|
You are so insecure, who said Michael was the King of the World. Since i'm defending him on a forum that obviously means I think he's God right? Immature. Secondly, Slave To The Rhythm wasn't even released as a single from Xscape and the video isn't even a real music video. It's a freaking hologram performance at the BBMA's.
Yep it peaked at 45, higher than all of Rebel Heart's singles. You were the one that even asked about it not me son.
A non-single, albeit a pretty crappy song by Michael's standard, by an artist that debuted in the 60s from a posthumous album without a real video is an underperformance? If that's what makes you sleep better at night. I wonder what that makes Rebel Heart's singles though?
Quote:
For what? No one ever mentioned Rebel Heart did astronomical numbers. Unless someone in here did?
|
That's not what I asked you. I asked could you give me a breakdown of it's sales since you seem so desperate paint everything Michael ever did, dead or alive, after the 90s as a failure. You bring up Michael's sales, i'm going to bring up Madonna's. Plain and simple. If you can't give me an answer then stop talking about Michael's sales and wasting both of our time.
Quote:
Little boy? Really, now? How old are you? 40? There is no argument or comparison at all because you keep going backwards and digging a deeper whole for yourself. And like I predicted I asked specifically for some videos and you continue to ignore it. With that being said, what are you implying about Madonna not reaching 50M or 100M in her 80s and 90s video views? Because if you are implying what I think you are, I have a great counter argument for you.
|
I called you a little boy because that's what you sound like. A child. You didn't ask me for anything. You said that you would ask me for the videos I was talking about and then went on to insult me by saying it would be like asking a child to read or write. Reading is fundamental. Also many of Madonna's videos are on different channels, some of which are blocked some of which aren't. Even if you add all of those views together they still don't surpass other's views, let alone Michael's. I brought up streaming so that even if she is in fact the only artist from the 70s/80s/90s with blocked videos and no Vevo, which you seem to really want to believe, she still pales in comparison to Michael and sevreal others there. Don't want to hear this, then like I said keep his name out of your mouth.
I don't feel like copying and pasting links this late at night but since you're too lazy to do it yourself here it is. None of these are on vevo and are all on various channels. If you want more you're going to have to go and find them.
Karma Chameleon: 207m
You're The One That I Want: 129m
We Are The World: 132m
Take On Me: 281m
I Will Always Love You: 161m
Quote:
According to UKMIX, Invincible is listed as around 5 million which sounds 100 times more reasonable. With that being said, I don’t know where you or Sony are plucking 13 million from. It also proves my point that Invincible has NOT sold 8 million worldwide and despite not being updated for years, I doubt Invincible has sold millions of copies throughout the years. Thanks for proving my point.
|
Like I said reading is fundamental. It clearly said that the minimum worldwide estimate is 6.7m, and that was over 7 years ago. I don't know where Sony got 13m either but if it has sold that what are you going to do about it. No one has exact figures, just estimates. Maybe you should call and ask Sony if this is so important to you. And like I said Sony's sabatoging of Invincible with extreme underpromotion plays a huge part in its sales.
Quote:
Well you can ask the user Pickachoo why he brought up Michael Jackson to begin with. Then you can blame the user OffTheWall for making it worse and bringing up sales and streams. The OP clearly just stated a fact that an artist from the 80s, THIS decade, has a video reach 200 million views. Nothing more and nothing less. I find it hilarious that you think only Madonna fans do this when nearly EVERY stan base does this. Have you seen the threads DMF has made? I don’t think Madonna needs validation from other stans because I think her achievements speak for themselves; the same way Michael’s achievements speak for themselves. Of course his other videos have no other celebrities because those are his 80s and 90s stuff.
|
I can also blame you for responding and then going on to say some of the most unsupported, unresearched, vile, and downright nasty things about Michael in this thread. Yes I do notice many stans do this, and it's pathetic each and every time. It's just the fact that ya'll stan for freaking Madonna of all people and still feel the need to be validated that makes it a bit more pathetic. The reason I responded to this one is because I saw my fave brought up in a negative manner, particularly by you, so I got involved. Like I said if you don't want to see me again, don't talk **** about Michael. Plain and simple.
Quote:
Right and the fact that you are downplaying Madonna’s not having a VEVO account or her videos available in all countries because it doesn’t work in Michael’s favor. It’s a two way street, buddy. Can’t have your cake and eat it too. I KNOW the difference between both terms and a FACT is that Madonna’s videos ARE NOT on her VEVO and ARE BANNED in countries. Glad we settled that.
|
I'm not downplaying it. I'm stating the fact that she is not the only person with this disasvantage. Why would that have anything to do with Michael? He has a Vevo account and his videos, both of his Vevo account and other accounts, are more than thriving. Again reading is fundamental.
Quote:
Let me add a little something over here:
http://www.billboard.com/charts/bill...200/2016-02-06
If you click the link above, we can clearly see the Immaculate Collection charting at number 49 on the Billboard 200 and this was this year in 2016. The link you provided showed the album charting in 2014. Therefore, you were wrong in saying the Immaculate Collection only charted ONCE in the past couple of years. Clearly it has charted multiple times and therefore your statement was proven wrong based on the evidence me and you provided. Verdict in my favor.
Michael has been over since 2001 because he had nothing new to offer since then. I mean he kept releasing greatest hits, box collections, re-releases and etc. He has NOTHING new and more importantly nothing GOOD to offer. That is primarily why I said both of his recent posthumous albums flopped tremendously. The music was just not cutting it. From an artist standpoint he had nothing left to offer and therefore has been over since. He gets most of his recognition from his 80s and 90s stuff. Is that a bad thing? Absolutely not. But it’s the cold hard truth.
Let’s not mention during 2001 til present, he has been accused of being a child molester, hung his youngest baby out the window, did some documentary with Martin Bashir that tried to paint him in a bad light, and unfortunately passed away in 2009. That’s exactly why I have been saying he has been over as an artist.
|
http://i.imgur.com/Bdxw1kK.gif
The fact is that 2014 was the FIRST time it charted since 1993. That is over a 20 year span of it being completely absent from the charts. I don't care how many times it's charted since 2014, but the fact is that it went over 20 years without charting.
Lmao at your backtracking. You originally insinuated that Michael had been over since 2001 in that nothing he did had been successful since that point. Yet another faulty point in your sad excuse for an argument. If Michael didn't realease anything during the last years of his life, then how are you going to say if it was good or not? There is no material to judge! And don't even try it with his posthumous material, which he more than likely didn't want released in the first place, nor was it more than likely his best anyway.
Lastly how are you going to assume that Michael had nothing left to offer during the last years of his life? How do you know he didn't still write songs? How do you know he still didn't make music? Because he decided not to release any and instead focus on fighting the allegations and settling down to raise his children? You're just talking out of your butt at this point.
Quote:
I have answered your question already. You don’t seem to want to answer mine but continuously spout more and more repeated nonsense just because a music video of Madonna reached 200M views. Are you saying Madonna has to surpass MJ in something in order for me to appreciate her as an artist? What kind of first grade mentality is that? Buddy, I am not back tracking anything at all.
So let me get this straight, you signed up for ATRL to defend Michael Jackson?! LMAO! Are you serious? Is that your ultimate life goal or something? To defend Michael Jackson every chance you get? There are MILLIONS of people who slander Michael Jackson. Why are you not defending him to them? Buddy, I don’t have to put you or anyone on ignore. I’m good. And I have been a fan of MJ since I was eight years old. You don’t know me, ok? You know nothing about me okay? With that being said, keep your ignorant comments to yourself and quit talking about belittling Michael Jackson when all you do is belittle Madonna ever since you got here.
Need proof?
http://atrl.net/?p=31069537
http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=862766&page=2
http://atrl.net/?p=29260578
|
Why do you are your stanbase constantly need to put down other artists most prodominetly those in my sig, to build her up? I could care less about this made up validation seeking record. I'm here because I saw my fave being dissed and hit with lies so I decided to settle the score. You can all set up a damn parade and national monument for Madonna for all I care, but the minute you try to insult Michael or anyone else in my signature to boost her up, especially when most of it is lies anyway, i'll be there to settle the score. Literally NO other stanbase tries it with Michael and those is my sig and much as ya'll do, not Britney stans, not Katy stans, not Gaga stans, literally NOBODY, so consequently most of my arguments are going to be with Madonna stans. If you don't like it like I said either keep the people in my signature's names out of your mouths or just simply put me on ignore.
Your desperation is truly fascinating. So because I signed up for an Atrl account to defend and argue about Michael and the other's in my signature, like literally yourself and everyone else here, that means it's my life goal and purpose? What kind of faux deducative reasoning? You don't know me nor do you know anything about my life kid.
And you can bring up all of my past argument with Madonna stans before like the insecure child you are. There will be more in the future. As long as the people in my signature continued to be downplayed and insulted by them, and yourself, i'll be there for the insuing argument.
Out of all of the bs you've said in this thread, you calling yourself a Michael fan is probably the most pathetic of all. Even your fave is a better Michael fan than you.
I'm going to end this argument with you and all future stans of anyone who disses my faves by saying what I said before.
http://vh1.mtvnimages.com/uri/mgid:f...1430255143.gif
Goodnight son
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...07/955/54e.gif
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/31/2012
Posts: 19,942
|
Not all these damn stipulations in order to make it sound like a record
-80s Artist
-THIS DECADE
-200M Views
-1M Views.
A "Nicki Minaj first black female rapper to go #1 on iTunes" Tea 
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 9/2/2011
Posts: 21,728
|
It's kind of one of her best songs post-Music
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/27/2016
Posts: 2,816
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
You at this point
https://cdn1.lockerdome.com/uploads/...9bf5_:original
You have the nerve to say your a Michael fan for the sake of saving yourself in this argument but you call him a pedophile, reduce his accomplishments to people feeling sorry for his death, and downplay him to uplift Madonna, not just on here but as I have too been looking through your posting history it seems you do that whenever he is brought up. That's just sorry and pathetic.
|
Instead of posting that, please find a parrot gif because that is both of us at this point and we are just heading down into a slope. I never called him a pedophile; I clearly stated he was ACCUSED of being a pedophile. There was even a thread made on here and I clearly said I never believed that he molested kids. Want me to pull it up for you? Let me repeat myself: I said he was ACCUSED of being a pedophile. Understand now? And don’t lie and say you have been through my posting history and claim I call Michael a pedophile.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Like I said if you're going to press me on and on about Michael's poshthomous sales then give me the breakdown of Rebel Heart's since you are so dead set at it selling over 1 million copies. And honey when you add this all up, which you don't seem to be that efficient at doing, the difference is still anywhere from 600k to 1M, with SPS added or not. And also in today's sales climate, be it 400k, 600k, or 1m, those are all significant margins.
Offthewall pointed out the fault in your logic, which are far and few between. Hard Candy was realeased in 2008, completely different sales climate, and supported with the highest grossing world tour by a solo artist of all time. MDNA was promoted with selling free tickets with the album, the FREAKING SUPERBOWL, the promo to end all promo, and another world tour. Xscape had none of this and still managed to sell 1.7m, from the grave. If Xscape is a flop then MDNA and Rebel Heart must be the absolute pits. The standards and playing field are not the same comparing the albums. Your logic and inability to make a valid comparison is truly astounding.
|
From this point on I am just going to keep it sweet and simple: ALL FIVE OF THESE ALBUMS UNDERPERFOMED despite whoever’s alive, whoever did promotion, and whoever did what! That’s it! Plain and simple! That’s it! Period point blank! It does not matter who did what, who’s still here to do promotion, who did the SuperBowl, and etc. It doesn’t matter. What you don’t understand is that at this point in Michael and Madonna’s careers, they are past their prime to be selling huge numbers like they used to back in the 80s when their music was new. END OF STORY. It does not matter who did 1.7, 1.5, 1.3, 1.1 or etc; THEIR ALBUMS UNDERPERFORMED. Let it go.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Yup is just proves your ignorance for insinuating that MJ's records only sold because he died. Also what has the majority of what you have said in this thread have to do with BIM passing 200m. What did you calling Michael a pedophile, saying he's been over since 2001, bringing up his sales and posthumous albums have to do with her so called record? Pot calling the kettle black if i've ever seen it.
|
Again, I said he was ACCUSED. Do you not know how to read? You can thank OffTheWall for saying Michael still outsells Madonna to this day which INCLUDES posthumous. I said his posthumous albums underperformed and I stand corrected with that. Next.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Confessions On A Dance Floor: $5.99
MDNA: $5.99
Even aside from itunes The Essential by Michael Jackson is $16.99 and still has no problem charting. Off The Wall is $9.99, the same price as the majority of Madonna's albums, and is still on the BB200 to this day. Your point is invalid.
|
For the love of God, I am NOT going to argue with you about Itunes prices! You said ALL pop albums are discounted! I showed you proof that IC wasn’t and that’s it! And IC is on Itunes! Happy? I am not going to sit here and argue about who discounted what and which album is charting where! Do you have any idea how childish and stupid this looks? My point stands corrected that not ALL pop albums are discounted on Itunes! Understand now?
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
You are so insecure, who said Michael was the King of the World. Since i'm defending him on a forum that obviously means I think he's God right? Immature. Secondly, Slave To The Rhythm wasn't even released as a single from Xscape and the video isn't even a real music video. It's a freaking hologram performance at the BBMA's.
Yep it peaked at 45, higher than all of Rebel Heart's singles. You were the one that even asked about it not me son.
A non-single, albeit a pretty crappy song by Michael's standard, by an artist that debuted in the 60s from a posthumous album without a real video is an underperformance? If that's what makes you sleep better at night. I wonder what that makes Rebel Heart's singles though?
|
Clearly I was being sarcastic. Do you know what sarcasm is? Apparently not. Wow. It peaked higher than Rebel Heart singles. What does he get? A medal? A cookie? Which one is it? It’s still not a hit by any means necessary so stop making it seem like that. Like the Rebel Heart singles, STTR is a FLOP. End of story. You can come with the excuses all you want; it doesn’t change the fact that it flopped
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
That's not what I asked you. I asked could you give me a breakdown of it's sales since you seem so desperate paint everything Michael ever did, dead or alive, after the 90s as a failure. You bring up Michael's sales, i'm going to bring up Madonna's. Plain and simple. If you can't give me an answer then stop talking about Michael's sales and wasting both of our time.
|
You seem so desperate to paint his posthumous new material as some kind of landmark success, when clearly it isn’t. You’re talking about wasting both of our times but that is what you have been doing ever since you stepped into this thread.
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
I called you a little boy because that's what you sound like. A child. You didn't ask me for anything. You said that you would ask me for the videos I was talking about and then went on to insult me by saying it would be like asking a child to read or write. Reading is fundamental. Also many of Madonna's videos are on different channels, some of which are blocked some of which aren't. Even if you add all of those views together they still don't surpass other's views, let alone Michael's. I brought up streaming so that even if she is in fact the only artist from the 70s/80s/90s with blocked videos and no Vevo, which you seem to really want to believe, she still pales in comparison to Michael and sevreal others there. Don't want to hear this, then like I said keep his name out of your mouth.
I don't feel like copying and pasting links this late at night but since you're too lazy to do it yourself here it is. None of these are on vevo and are all on various channels. If you want more you're going to have to go and find them.
|
Right, because if I asked you on the first attempt you would not have done it. As I asked before, WHAT THE HELL DO YOU GET IF YOU REACH A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF VIEWS? Can you please explain to me? Because I am totally confused. Not to mention there are some songs of the 80s and 90s that were hits and they don’t have millions of views. Does that make them worthless? Does that make them less classic or less iconic? Can you answer these questions please?
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Like I said reading is fundamental. It clearly said that the minimum worldwide estimate is 6.7m, and that was over 7 years ago. I don't know where Sony got 13m either but if it has sold that what are you going to do about it. No one has exact figures, just estimates. Maybe you should call and ask Sony if this is so important to you. And like I said Sony's sabatoging of Invincible with extreme underpromotion plays a huge part in its sales.
|
What the hell do you mean what am I going to do about? What kind of a dumb question is that?  Like do you have any idea how ridiculous and immature you sound right now? At the end of the day, Invincible has roughly sold around 5 million and that’s that. What are you going to do about that?
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
I can also blame you for responding and then going on to say some of the most unsupported, unresearched, vile, and downright nasty things about Michael in this thread. Yes I do notice many stans do this, and it's pathetic each and every time. It's just the fact that ya'll stan for freaking Madonna of all people and still feel the need to be validated that makes it a bit more pathetic. The reason I responded to this one is because I saw my fave brought up in a negative manner, particularly by you, so I got involved. Like I said if you don't want to see me again, don't talk **** about Michael. Plain and simple.
|
Really? There are loads of people on the face of the planet that say worse stuff, yet you are going to claim the things I said was vile and nasty? LMAO. Whatever you say, skippy. Dude you cannot generalize all Madonna fans at all; you might as well generalize all other fan bases. I find it hilarious you sit here and say Madonna fans try to validate it by bashing other artists; do you not see what they Britney, Katy, Bey, and Gaga fans do? Want me to show you? OTHER people brought up MJ in a negative manner. Why are you not targeting them? Are you in love with me or something?
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
The fact is that 2014 was the FIRST time it charted since 1993. That is over a 20 year span of it being completely absent from the charts. I don't care how many times it's charted since 2014, but the fact is that it went over 20 years without charting.
Lmao at your backtracking. You originally insinuated that Michael had been over since 2001 in that nothing he did had been successful since that point. Yet another faulty point in your sad excuse for an argument. If Michael didn't realease anything during the last years of his life, then how are you going to say if it was good or not? There is no material to judge! And don't even try it with his posthumous material, which he more than likely didn't want released in the first place, nor was it more than likely his best anyway.
Lastly how are you going to assume that Michael had nothing left to offer during the last years of his life? How do you know he didn't still write songs? How do you know he still didn't make music? Because he decided not to release any and instead focus on fighting the allegations and settling down to raise his children? You're just talking out of your butt at this point.
|
It doesn’t matter how many years it took, you clearly stated it only charted once in the past couple of years and I proved you wrong. YOU don’t backtrack, alright? Like I said a million times MJ has been OVER since 2001! Which NEW, studio albums of his have been remotely successful this decade? Oh that’s right you cannot answer that question. Because since 2001 as I mentioned all he released was greatest hits, compilations, reissues, and etc.
He didn’t have anything else to offer. Why do you think he is only revered for his 80s and 90s stuff? What the hell does he have from this new millennium up until now that is considered remarkable? Slave to the Rhythm? You Rock My World?
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
Why do you are your stanbase constantly need to put down other artists most prodominetly those in my sig, to build her up? I could care less about this made up validation seeking record. I'm here because I saw my fave being dissed and hit with lies so I decided to settle the score. You can all set up a damn parade and national monument for Madonna for all I care, but the minute you try to insult Michael or anyone else in my signature to boost her up, especially when most of it is lies anyway, i'll be there to settle the score. Literally NO other stanbase tries it with Michael and those is my sig and much as ya'll do, not Britney stans, not Katy stans, not Gaga stans, literally NOBODY, so consequently most of my arguments are going to be with Madonna stans. If you don't like it like I said either keep the people in my signature's names out of your mouths or just simply put me on ignore.
Your desperation is truly fascinating. So because I signed up for an Atrl account to defend and argue about Michael and the other's in my signature, like literally yourself and everyone else here, that means it's my life goal and purpose? What kind of faux deducative reasoning? You don't know me nor do you know anything about my life kid.
And you can bring up all of my past argument with Madonna stans before like the insecure child you are. There will be more in the future. As long as the people in my signature continued to be downplayed and insulted by them, and yourself, i'll be there for the insuing argument.
Out of all of the bs you've said in this thread, you calling yourself a Michael fan is probably the most pathetic of all. Even your fave is a better Michael fan than you.
|
As I mentioned before, ALL stan bases do this! Hello. Where have you been? This is ATRL. There are fan bases who have dissed Madonna in order to build up their favorites. Why don’t you say anything about that? No other stan base tries it with the artists in your signature? So the Navy NEVER comes after Beyonce on this website?
I loved how you ignored the fact that there was a thread about Whitney Houston supposedly shading Gaga. You know what a Gaga fan said in regards to that video? They said: “Karma is a b*tch”; which takes a shot at Whitney Houston. And where the hell were you at? Why are you not confronting that Gaga fan for saying something like that?
LMAO. There would be more in the future. Are you mentally ill or something? I am seriously concerned for you mental and I am not even trying to be funny or sarcastic. I seriously think something is wrong with you.
And you are correct. I don’t know you or anything about your life. I don’t WANT to. I don’t want to know someone who is so nasty and mentally damaged.
I am and will always be an MJ fan. Something I have been since I was eight. I am not like you who band-wagoned after he passed away. Sorry.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/4/2014
Posts: 22,877
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/27/2011
Posts: 13,026
|
damn I didn't realise what went down in this thread

|
|
|
Member Since: 4/20/2011
Posts: 4,134
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KingKunta
[
Belittling Madonna? So what is this?
Fact: Madonna's album just now crossed the 1m mark and if it hasn't is still sitting at around 900k. Xscape has sold anywhere from 1.7m to 2m.
This is just so idiotic and juevenile i'm not going to waste my time collecting the recipets to ether it. I will say that Thriller was still the best selling album of all time before he died and i'm going to leave it at that.
Fact: ALL POP ALBUMS ARE DISCOUNTED ON ITUNES RIGHT NOW, INCLUDING MADONNA'S. I see Michael's Number Ones resting at #22 and Thriller sitting at #59. Madonna's are no where to be found here in US itunes, at least it the top 150.
Fact: More than both Ghosttown and LFL. Also charted higher than Ghosttown, LFL, and BIM.
Fixed that for you.
https://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=110645
https://www.bpi.co.uk/home/british-a...sic-sales.aspx
If you don't mind me asking could you give me the link and sales breakdown for Rebel Heart if you don't mind  .
Little boy this is moreso you and your lack or ability to form a legitamate argument and comparison without calling those facts brought against you as "excuses." The fact is Invincible was deliberately sabatoged by Sony and was extremely underpromoted. The fact is numerous videos from the 70s/80/90s aren't on Vevo and aren't available in all countries yet have still been able to cross the 50m and in some cases the 100m benchmark. if they could do it then surely Madonna should have been able to.
Also if your going to make ludicrus claims like MJ has been over since 2001 why can't you take the time to research your own facts to back that up? Are you that lazy? But anyway here it is
Sony
http://www.lipstickalley.com/showthr...he-King-Of-POP
Ukmix (hasn't been updated since 2009 so it's probably more than this)
https://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=63110
Why are did you start belittiling Michael then? What does that have to do with BIM surpassing 200m views? Why are you in this thread? Why are you here if you don't care about any video hitting the 100m or 200m mark? You should ask the majority of these questions to the OP who made up this so called "achievement" in the first place, more than likely out of insecurity and a need for validation from other stans. And no little boy. Deceased Michael had one other celebrity in his video while Madonna had at least 7 or 8 different celebrities in her's. And also on Michael's videos that actually have 200m+ views no other celebrities are present.
Like I said these are two completely different situations child. The only reason you are downplaying the fact that Invincible's underpromotion played a part in it's underperformance and that Madonna not having a Vevo account or her videos available in all countries is because it doesn't work it in her favor. "Excuses" and facts are two different things. Learn the difference.
http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=509271
If you don't want to talk about catalog sales, streaming, and views then why did you say Michael has been over since 2001? Why say something so stupid and then get mad when you get facts thrown in your face? You have done nothing but accentuate that Michael was a pedophile, attribute all of his post-death accomplishments to mere sympathy (even though he dies a whole 7 years ago), and put him down to boost Madonna up when the stats explicitly state quite the opposite. You should be the last person trying to accuse someone of belittiling an artist.
QUOTE=C.Damen;35339425]
For the upteenth time, why did you say that Michael has been over since 2001 and people only buy his records out of sympathy if you weren't going to back it up? Why say something so stupid and no even look to see if your fave surpasses him in anything (catalog sales, re-charting, video views, streaming, none of which she does)? Why are you back tracking? If you don't care to even research and look for simple reciepts why make such stupid claims? I'm signed up here to defend my fave like everyone else and if you don't like it you can kindly put me on ignore. I'm suprised you actually acknowledge that Michael has impact since you've done nothing but act like an immature child regarding him this entire thread. Now you want to acknowledge him and impact now that you can't defend your argument.
Let this be a learning experience and if you don't want to argue about Michael or Madonna, keep her's and especially his name out of your mouth.
http://vh1.mtvnimages.com/uri/mgid:f...1430255143.gif
|
Your fav is dead and there are maggots crawling all over his dead body. It's time to move on.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 12,604
|
King Kunta in the thread like

|
|
|
Member Since: 3/6/2014
Posts: 13,604
|
Happy for her  , the song though... 
|
|
|
|
|