Quote:
Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder
She literally says that that she'll vote for her because she's qualified. The QUESTION was "what do you think about a female running for president.
God, y'all sexist af.
|
How is He/She sexist?!
Why do you label people like that? It's not going to help at all.
He/She has a point. Hilary is the best option because she is the most qualified between her and that other thing (I won't even name him -.-). Secondly because she is a woman, and it would be great to have the first woman in office in the US history
But I don't think he was coming from a sexist perspective, pointing this out.
Obviously the phrasing was a bit misleading.
Hilary should be voted because she has experience and she is the most qualified candidate, regardless of her sex. That's the best feminist statement we may conceive for her. Especially because she needs everyone's vote and she will have sexist people voting against her just because she is a woman. They will use this against her! So it needs to be clear WHY she is the best candidate. And the reason why it's not her gender. Which is kinda ironic, considering that being a woman wouldn't be considered like an advantage in stuff like that. But sexist people, who usually happen to be conservative, will label this like a progressive trend, trying to stop her.