why are none of the axis labelled
If the marks are in the x axis then it is 3

3

according to google translate

elevi = students

so 8 is the number of students that scored 5

Not maths

3?

how? idgi?

it's obviously 3 why do people say it is 8?

27

The axis are meant to be labelled.

3, cuz the blocks are the students I believe?

Wait this is ****ed up. You can't solve this without having the x and y labeled.

In a frequency graph, it's bad form to make the frequency the x-axis (because it's the dependent variable) which means that the frequency is the y-axis. So the answer has to be 3 They should have labelled the axes though.

The bars represent the number of students so the answer has to be 3.

3. The x-axis is the math score and the y-axis is the frequency (# of students).

So ATRL is more clever than Romanian eighth graders.

shame on my country

ummm. 3?

27.

who reported this

Why was this reported

3

Why are the axes not labelled!
Its 3 or 8

The axis should be labelled, but they don't have to be labelled in order to draw a conclusion.

It only makes sense if the x-axis is the score and the y-axis is the number of students, because a longer column equates to a more frequent result. Having the x-axis be the number of students doesn't make sense because there are repeat instances (5 + 9 + 10 students getting a score of 3).

So it's either 3 (score of exactly 5) or 27 (scored at least 5).