Originally posted by Legacy

I have a few questions.

First of all how come he wasn't proved guilty by the jury members? Those things were showed to them?

Second, weren't the books proven to be "artistic" ?

Third, there is no proof of the torture and SM pics?

Finally, there are false facts in the article. The description of the penis did not match If I remember correctly.

Oh and why publishing this now, 4 days before the 7th anniversary of his death?

Originally posted by artpop

i actually don't understand how people can be so stupid? read the article, watch the video, nothing is shown absolutely nothing.

its actually disgusting read the billboard article for ****s sake

http://www.billboard.com/articles/ne...phy-collection