Quote:
Originally posted by brianc33616
No actually a good point. I kept Political Duopoly in there, but I changed some of the wording I think you found biased.
|
I just want it to be clarified that many very intelligent people oppose the idea of third parties, or oppose voting for them given the situation right now.
I know that I'm the main subject of the Hillary lines in the OP, so I would just like to note that I am in the process of becoming the founding President of my campus's Green Party chapter - which, given the fractured and weak Iowa Green Party right now, will hopefully expand into becoming the leading Green Party force in Iowa right now. Alternatively I've considered establishing a permanent group to be a partition or counterpart of the Democratic Party that exists separately but sort of within the party, pulling the whole thing to the left the best we can.
I am voting for Hillary Clinton; I am a registered Democrat. I have her books, I have followed her political career for over eight years now, and I would probably quite literally bleed for her if necessary. But I am also someone who strives for intellectual discussion, for more representation in American political systems, and for a more diverse system. I also fight for the Democratic Party, because despite my intellect and my attention to the political workings of America - or, perhaps, because of them - I have
faith in this party and its potential.
I just wanted to note that I don't like the idea that diehard Democrats (or Republicans, but I'm not going to defend them and I'm not sorry about it) can't be incredibly intelligent individuals with deep understanding of the world and political system around them. There can be disagreements about whether this system we have is inherently evil and untrustworthy. There are some of us who indeed would like to see more parties despite identifying very closely with one of the two big ones.
I'd like to elaborate upon why I would have such an interest in the Green Party and would start a chapter at my university, despite openly identifying as a Democrat and having no intention to switch my registration. I will always be a Democrat - I will always be a part of a party that I see as being good, as being a trailblazer in liberal ideology and policy for generations. As I brought up with you the other day, I have deep respect for the liberal accomplishments of Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, and Barack Obama. I have deep respect for what they stood for, and by the same token I have an unwavering and powerful sense of admiration for Hillary Clinton. She has worked long and hard for the ideas that I want to see in our policy, and I honestly don't believe for a second that she is the monster that some claim her to be. We could talk about her another time. But I want the Democrats to unite with the Green Party, learn from them, establish a relationship, and work for the betterment of America, because I am a very liberal Democrat who aligns extremely well with Greens.
I have admiration for the way that the Green Party has striven to bring national attention to very liberal lines of thought, especially regarding environmentalism and a few other things. I think that Jill Stein is an incredibly essential figure in American politics right now, actually. She legitimately seeks the absolute best for our country, advocating tested and proven liberal ideology as the solution to our problems. I admire the grassroots campaigning and the hard work that is essential in the Green Party's operation and in motivating people to fight for these solutions. That's part of why I'm so deeply interested in them as a third party; the other part is, of course, my own ideological leanings. I want that model of hard work, of honest and unabashed liberalism and factual evidence, to be the model for the Democratic Party going forward.
Where you and I differ most is perception. I do not find there is a basis for me to reject or hate the Democratic Party; you do. I feel that most Democrats are working hard for change and progress that helps the people of this country. They are working toward full practicing voting rights for everyone; they are working toward breaking up the banks when necessary to ensure the security of citizens; they are working for women's reproductive health and economic equity; and there's so much more. There are corporate interests involved, sure, but I don't see that always as being bad. In fact, I would expect with the size of the party that there are a few rotten apples. I don't see that party as being corrupt or evil in any way that is inherent to its being; not at all.
I'll be sticking around in here a little bit if it takes off to talk more about the Green Party, my identification on some level with it, and how I would like to see it work in the future, and I'll certainly engage myself in this discussion. I just thought it necessary - given your recent help request's contents and the contents of this thread - to be forthright about my own stance on third parties and to provide some background showing that I'm very open to (and enthusiastic about) their participation in politics.