Video Clip: Guy Clocks Taylor Swift - Page 2

odin_envy_me

Quote:

Originally posted by Gossamer™

If that were the case, then Hillary Clinton wouldn't have the presidential nomination.

The US is holding its 58th Presidential elections. Since there are 2 "major" candidates every election, that's 116 Presidential nominations.

Hillary is on her way to be the first candidate nominated by one of the 2 big parties.

If the U.S. is a meritocracy, you are implying that for every 117 capable men, there is 1 capable woman.

And if you say that that's because women have historically been discriminated against, but it's all equal now, well, the current Congress is still < 20% female, and elections to that body were held in the past few years.

plz stop

Gossamer™

Quote:

Originally posted by odin_envy_me

The US is holding its 58th Presidential elections. Since there are 2 "major" candidates every election, that's 116 Presidential nominations.

Hillary is on her way to be the first candidate nominated by one of the 2 big parties.

If the U.S. is a meritocracy, you are implying that for every 117 capable men, there is 1 capable woman.

And if you say that that's because women have historically been discriminated against, but it's all equal now, well, the current Congress is still < 20% female, and elections to that body were held in the past few years.

plz stop

No one is saying that women are less capable than men. But most women would rather take ******** gender studies courses, then say that women are underrepresented in politics and science.

Ash12345

How does it not matter what the dictionary says when a few people are hypocrites?
It just means that those people are wrong and chauvinists in disguise.

Also she said, I've never really been seen myself as being held back until I was a women. And then he says that she hasn't been held back.
Like wtf?

Ash12345

Quote:

Originally posted by alestevens

LMAO i can't believe i just sat through 5 minutes of this ********. Let's see:

-Taylor said she stands for feminism because it stands for equality. Then this guy drags her because other people that is not Taylor have used different definitions he didn't like

-Then he dragged Taylor because of how good her upbringing was, as if Taylor ever in her life complained about that or something

-Then he put a list of most powerful celebrities and he kinda had a point on this one. But on the other hand, it's a fact that the entertainment industry goes much harder on any female making a mistake than they do on a male. I mean, i'd be curious to see what happens to, let's say Adele, if she did what Justin Bieber has been doing lately.

-Then he dragged Taylor because Sony Music supports pro-rape lyrics and "they gave her her big break", when in fact Taylor got her big break with Big Machine, which uses distribution from Universal. So on top of it all, he couldn't even do the most basic research. A mess!

you really explained everything tbh. Perfect response

LoveInStereo

This is just another one of those meninist douchebags talking out of his ass without any kind of educated basis for his arguments. Stats very clearly prove that systematic oppression against women exists in North America. I find it troubling that you'd actually post this with the expectation that people would resonate with it when it supports misogynistic ideologies

LoveInStereo

Quote:

Originally posted by Gossamer™

No one is saying that women are less capable than men. But most women would rather take ******** gender studies courses, then say that women are underrepresented in politics and science.

How can you make these sweeping generalizations about what women want? Stats prove that politicians & CEOs are generally married to people without careers who have the flexibility to raise kids & help manage their spouse's busy lives. Men almost never fill that role but observation of other cultures has proven that there's no biological distinction between the caregiving prowess of men & women - same goes for the drive to parent. Studies of how girls are socialized by parents & teachers show a distinct pattern that they're discouraged from pursuing science & math. They're not making individual decisions to not participate, society tells them from day one that they don't belong. Do you hate women? You're literally using the ways they react to being discriminated against to justify their oppression. Gross.

Gossamer™

Quote:

Originally posted by LoveInStereo

This is just another one of those meninist douchebags talking out of his ass without any kind of educated basis for his arguments. Stats very clearly prove that systematic oppression against women exists in North America. I find it troubling that you'd actually post this with the expectation that people would resonate with it when it supports misogynistic ideologies

Here are some videos of him having evidence and research to back up his claims:

Quote:

Originally posted by LoveInStereo

How can you make these sweeping generalizations about what women want? Stats prove that politicians & CEOs are generally married to people without careers who have the flexibility to raise kids & help manage their spouse's busy lives. Men almost never fill that role but observation of other cultures has proven that there's no biological distinction between the caregiving prowess of men & women - same goes for the drive to parent. Studies of how girls are socialized by parents & teachers show a distinct pattern that they're discouraged from pursuing science & math. They're not making individual decisions to not participate, society tells them from day one that they don't belong. Do you hate women? You're literally using the ways they react to being discriminated against to justify their oppression. Gross.

Sigh...