Quote:
Originally posted by MrLovett
She's not irrelevant to the situation though, she is the woman that spent 14 years of her life with him and bore his children. Her testimony of their lives together plays heavily towards his character, whether she was there for this situation or not. It can't just be discounted because it favours Johnny.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrLovett
That's not how it works though. We don't know for certain that he even attacked her and she didn't create the injury herself, obviously I'm not suggesting this but as I said, we don't have the full story. I'm sorry but testimony from a person who has spent 14 years with another person is not worthless when it comes to discussing patterns of behaviour. She's not just "one of Johnny's exes" she spent a long time with him.
You clearly already have it in your head that he did this, which is why you're refusing to look at the other side of the argument. That's not how justice works and without the full story everything needs to be looked at. Sorry.  |
Quote:
Originally posted by MrLovett
the fact that people are just jumping straight on him without the whole story or facts is quite sickening.
|
This, ladies and gents, should be everyone's stance on these cases. We don't know barely anything and shouldn't be attacking either of them.
Nobody is discrediting her, they are treading lightly as should you. No one should be 100% on either side it makes no sense at the moment.
