Quote:
Originally posted by King Maxx
Well he appointed 5 members to the DNC committee who writes the party's platform. I'm sure they will fight to get rid of super delegates or have them vote proportionally. He will fight to change other things about delegates and the primaries. All of that will be worked out b4 the convention.
Even if he is successful, people have done the math, and Hillary would still win the nomination if that happens.
|
Which the DNC gave to him graciously! But yeah, part of the business that is conducted at the convention is for the DNC's platform for the upcoming session. So it wouldn't affect anything as it is now with his delegate allocation, that's said and done. Superdelegates do vote then tho, but most of those are pledged already. All they do is make it official. And like you said, HRC would still have the nom either way. But honestly, the platform itself is pretty irrelevant overall. It isn't really instrumental to anything (considering its non-binding) and has been described as the "Miss Congeniality" of the convention.
Even then, a lot of the planks that he would want added on to the platform are already largely supported by HRC. The only things I could see him fighting for would be the superdelegates and campaign finance, but those rules aren't decided at the convention. They're decided by DNC-empaneled commissions in between presidential contests. So none of this would take effect until 2020.
The only reason why the platform is even being talked about like this is because this is a way to get Sanders to endorse HRC during the GE. And he and his supporters get to feel like the DNC listened, and implemented his platform into the DNC's platform. But if Sanders overplays his hand and wants to do something crazy like completely rewrite everything and create chaos on the floor during the convention (which he's alluded to!) then thats when issues will happen. And thats where the significance lies, not really the ACTUAL platform itself.