I'd like to ask johnsuxx and however many other katy perry fans it will take: Why is Susan Boyle a bigger star than your fave? Critically and commercially. I await a detailed response otherwise Katy is less than Susan.
2009 had multiple fads that have higher career stats than Katy. Some people just prefer longevity.
Nothing stopped TIDAL from reporting all those fake TLOP streams.
Lemonade in the UK
Quote:
The record also enjoyed a strong week on streaming, accounting for 10,000 equivalent sales (14%) of its overall sales figure – the biggest streaming sales for a Number 1 album since streaming was introduced into the chart last year.
Susan's released double the amount of albums Katy has.
Well, comparing just their first 3 albums, Susan wins. Definitely in the US at least, even though Katy is an "American superstar" while Susan is a British reality show winner.
Well, comparing just their first 3 albums, Susan wins. Definitely in the US at least, even though Katy is an "American superstar" while Susan is a British reality show winner.
Not sure about worldwide.
sold over 14M copies WW, with over 10M being outside the US. That's more than Katy Perry's 3 albums sold outside the US !
2009 had multiple fads that have higher career stats than Katy. Some people just prefer longevity.
This doesn't explain anything, Kworb. How has Katy Perry, allegedly beautiful and easily able to get #1 hits, not able to outsell frumpy, fad amoeba Susan Boyle? And if Katy had longevity she would've been able to send her hit singles into the top 10 of iTunes after the Payola Bowl. So why is Susan effortlessly bigger?
AUHHHH
'GIRL NOO.. you aint no badgal. BARBIE FURBY KIRBY! (rap)'