A lot of people may not realise but feminism is doing some immoral things to our society and it needs to be exposed and talked about.
It's women like the one in this video that cause a lot of people to have doubts when people say they've been raped.
We need a society where ONLY people who are raped say they've been raped.
Being handcuffed by a police officer is NOT rape.
A man going up to someone and trying to kiss them is NOT rape (it's wrong, but it's not rape).
Having sex when you're drunk is NOT rape.
Having sex and regretting it the next day is NOT rape (it's called making a bad decision).
Being physically overpowered by someone and being forcefully made to have sex without wanting to IS rape. That's what it has been in every society on Earth for all of human history, except with the one exception of Western society from around 2013 onwards (because feminists are trying to change the definition of rape to give women the "power" to send any man they want to prison).
The feminist's ideal world is that a woman can say "This man raped me" and everybody in the world believes the woman the man goes straight to prison without question. Can't you see that this is wrong?
You're being far too sensationalist about the misuse of feminism
No, if he had handled it better it wouldn't have escalated as it did. You can hardly blame the girl being fearful for her life given how quickly cops will pull out a gun.
No. That girl did not sound fearful at all.
And police are humans, too. I think the one in the video was extremely patient.
Michael Moorcock: After Right-Wing Women and Ice and Fire you wrote Intercourse. Another book which helped me clarify confusions about my own sexual relationships. You argue that attitudes to conventional sexual intercourse enshrine and perpetuate sexual inequality. Several reviewers accused you of saying that all intercourse was rape. I haven’t found a hint of that anywhere in the book. Is that what you are saying?
Andrea Dworkin: No, I wasn’t saying that and I didn’t say that, then or ever. There is a long section in Right-Wing Women on intercourse in marriage. My point was that as long as the law allows statutory exemption for a husband from rape charges, no married woman has legal protection from rape. I also argued, based on a reading of our laws, that marriage mandated intercourse—it was compulsory, part of the marriage contract. Under the circumstances, I said, it was impossible to view sexual intercourse in marriage as the free act of a free woman. I said that when we look at sexual liberation and the law, we need to look not only at which sexual acts are forbidden, but which are compelled.
