Those from artists such as Kesha and Katy Perry?

If yes, do you consider this as supporting an alleged rapist, as you are 'promoting and supporting a Dr. Luke produced single, which in turn gives Dr. Luke money'?

thankfully im not constantly blasting my ill-informed judgements in regards to feminism and keshas case on social media so i cant be considered hypocritical for continuing to listen to Keshas past discography.

I listen to the songs I already bought. He already got my money, so not listening to them isn't going to make a difference. I don't think there is a problem with it either way, though. Kesha still performs songs that she did with Dr. Luke (I believe), so if she is okay with it, why should it be an issue?

Why would anyone care if you 'blasted your ill-informed judgements' on social media?

she performs songs that she wrote yes. but shes legally not really allowed to perform anything else, especially anything new. shes working with what she has and making money and at the end of the day theyre still her creations.

Yes. How am I supposed to listen to Kesha if I didn't?

unlike demi lovato, thankfully they dont
but if they did, i would be considered a hypocrite for doing so.
and just personally, if i was doing what she does, than yes, i would be a hypocrite. whether or not anyone "cared".

Yes, I'm not going to stop listening to the songs he made with Nicki. Especially considering I already bought them.

Yes. I still bop to Ke$ha's discography

Um, no, she's allowed to cover another artists songs at her concert if she wants to. Do you not see covers on the set lists of concerts all the time?

I don't understand this. Can you rephrase it or something?

Yes

Heres the catch 22, theyre not his songs. theyre her songs that he produced. they were written by her. the melodies are hers. she has attachments to them because they are her creations. why shouldnt she perform them? shes even re-imagined some of them. and she does do covers, but its not like she can just do covers.

and sure:
this thread was created based on the backlash demi received for tweeting support for jlos luke produced track. when she previously got on taylor for not in her eyes "correctly" being apart of the freekesha movement. so this thread is ultimately confronting demis "haters" by saying "why are you coming at demi when you probably still listen to luke produced songs yourself". but the problem with this argument is that I am not demi lovato. I am not posting a series of harsh and judgemental tweets calling someone a non-feminist and preaching at the masses with ill-informed opinions. if demi buys a luke produced song I think shes a hypocrite for sure. and if i was like her or an obnoxious social justice warrior i would also be a hypocrite. but thankfully im not. so nah, i dont feel bad for listening to some random kesha song from 2009 that was produced by him that i probably didnt even buy in the first place actually.

I don't think I had many (if any) songs produced by him in my iTunes library in the first place.

Yeah of course. Why wouldn't I? LMAO. He wasn't convicted.

I LOVE Kesha immensely and support her to the end, but yes I still do. Not as much though,and only a few songs. Ive been listening to Dark Horse a lot lately, even though I hate both Dr Luke and Katy perry