BOO HOO

No one but HillaryBots care, get over it

Not true, there's a reason Bernie is the only of the two that is frequently asked how he plans to work with Republicans in Congress. Hillary has a record of being able to compromise, Bernie has always been his way, or the highway, and that does not work in our government whatsoever. And, frankly, I am happy that it is setup like that. We don't need a dictatorship.

Yeah, Bernie has the most global impact

Poor Secretary of State

He wants to work with Democrats. Republicans are never going to agree with his plans no matter what. They don't want free healthcare, free tuition, higher minimum wages, etc. They won't work with Hillary on Obamacare or raising the minimum wage either. Maybe debt-free tuition, but that won't work in practice anyway.

I don't see the point in trying to compromise with stubborn Republicans

Is it possible for Hillary to lock up the nomination before the California primary (June 7) if Bernie does not drop out?

Then why is he suing them??
Hillary was able to pass the Children's Health Insurance Program in the 90s with overwhelming bipartisan support. The thing is, compromise is achievable. Saying, "Welp, compromise can't be done, so let's not try" is not a good argument in any way, Marvin. That's why I am voting for Hillary because she has acknowledged the importance of compromise and Bernie simply has not. He's the kid in a school group project that you would hate to work with.

Also, Hillary's debt-free tuition would work fine in practice. If it doesn't work in practice (as per your claim), then Bernie's more ambitious free tuition program, by extension, will also not work.
Maybe because they control Congress. You know, the part of our government that passes laws and legislation?

With superdelegates included, she has a very high chance of passing the 2,383 threshold before then. Without it, it's about 50-50. Depends on how she does in the upcoming huge contests of Maryland, Washington State, New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey mostly

In terms on likelihood. Iowa >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hawaii > Washington >>>>>>>>>>> Alaska

I used Iowa as a point of comparison.

He's suing them because they deserve it.

Republicans didn't hate Hillary like they do now in the 90s. She will gets less done than Obama did. Trying to pretend like Republicans will be eager to help her create a legacy for herself is comical.

Obama tried to compromise and look how that worked out Compromise only works when you have people that want to compromise. Bernie knows this, and he'd had no problem with it if the Republicans weren't being so stubborn. They can't even let Obama choose the SC Justice without crying about it. It's pointless.

But hopefully things change in Congress in November so we don't have to worry about them.

Thank you.

I want this mess to be over right now, can't believe it might go on until June.

How did they deserve it when his campaign did something illegal?

Secondly, how can you say he wants to work with Democrats when he's suing them and constantly calls them corrupt? He's clearly shown to not like the party and be a strong advocator against it. Try working with someone that insults you and sues you and see how likely you are willing to work with them. People like you have this irrational idea that American politics is this evil overgrown thing that is calculated to be corrupt. No, it's corrupt because people are designed to be corrupt by nature (so is Bernie). But, the people in politics work no differently from us and it's all about compromise and working in a team. Bernie has never shown the ability to work with other people. That's why he has the ranked as being the worst in bipartisan appeal and ability to work in a bipartisan fashion. That is not an attractive quality in a president.

YES THEY DID! They spent MILLIONS of dollars against her to make sure that all of her ideas got gridlocked and destroyed. She fought for single-payer in the 90s and the Republicans went after her and attacked her with Whitewater and so many other scam scandals. However, when she isn't running for a position, Republicans say nothing but positive things about her. Jeb Bush presented her with an award and praised her right before this election season. Republicans get along with her fine when she's already in a public position. But they would rather have someone of their own get the position instead and they fear her capability of getting elected, so they go after her. That's just how politics work.

No he didn't... Obama was actually not that great at compromise. The most recent president who did a good job of compromise was Bill Clinton. It's why very left progressives don't like him. But, he ended his presidency with a surplus in the national budget.

Gerrymandering is a thing, so that's not going to happen.

I'm so frustrated with all this race-baiting fear mongering Islamaphobia being spread not just by social media and Trump/Cruz but by journalists too. An article loses credibility anytime it is says "Islam" is the problem.

Been following this election for some time now and it's so much more entertaining than British politics

Anyway I really hope Hillary wins. YouGov did a poll here a few weeks ago and exactly half of people said they want her to win. Bernie got 17% which was still twice as much as any Republican. We're so sensible

BS! Literally Obamas whole 1st term was him TRYING to reach across aisle and work with Republicans but they kept slapping his hand down which is why liberals were furious with him...when he got reelected, THAT's when he said **** the republicans

That being said, it does take compromise and but Obama got plenty done during his presidency so I don't know where this idea that he didn't is coming from granted he could've gotten a lot more done it the GOP didn't make it their sole responsibility to oppose any and everything he wanted to do

The most Obama compromised was keeping the Bush tax cuts in exchange of allowing for extending unemployment benefits. Obama didn't compromise must else, mostly because the Republicans did not want to. The Tea Party really screwed us all over.

Compromise should not be seen as a dirty word. Sometimes it is the only way to make progress. Teddy Roosevelt, FDR and LBJ wanted much bigger reforms, but they had to compromise. The way the constitution is set up favors the status and inherently makes progress hard. Generally, only incremental progress has worked in this country.

Bernie wants a "political revolution," which is fine, but my issue is that he's going to war with the very "establishment" that he needs for the revolution to happen. Hillary is party-building and helping Democratic candidates get elected. She's raised tens of millions of dollars ($26.9 million, last I saw) for the Democratic Party. Donations to the Hillary Victory Fund go to the DNC and state Democratic Parties, too.

Bernie has raised precisely $1,000 for the Democrats. He's suing the DNC over a punishment that resulted from the actions of his campaign staffers. He's demonizing the Democratic establishment at every rally when he'll need them to make his agenda happen. He's asking his supporters to start a political revolution, but hasn't done much himself to get Democrats elected.

This election cycle has been so abnormal. If Trump and Clinton are the nominees, we will see the rise of Clinton Republicans and Trump Democrats.The Bernie Bros who hate Hillary will vote Trump, and the RINOs who are horrified by Trump will vote Hillary.

Is that why Bernie when the Democrats Abroad vote in the UK? Interesting?

General UK public =/= Democrats in the UK