Originally posted by Retro

There was no rule broken and there was nothing regarding having her own email server that she was "made aware of" by being denied a secure device.

They denied a secure device with a BULL reason - "oh only the president can have that sorry, you as Secretary of State aren't important enough" - and then later she found out she wasn't required to have a secure government device at all. Not. Her. Problem.

I don't know how to make this more clear to you. She did literally nothing other Secretaries had not done. She broke no actual rules and, as far as everyone who's so far commented is concerned, no laws either. It doesn't make her look bad to anyone who bothers to use their time to research and to assess precedent.

Originally posted by Retro

There was no rule broken and there was nothing regarding having her own email server that she was "made aware of" by being denied a secure device.

They denied a secure device with a BULL reason - "oh only the president can have that sorry, you as Secretary of State aren't important enough" - and then later she found out she wasn't required to have a secure government device at all. Not. Her. Problem.

I don't know how to make this more clear to you. She did literally nothing other Secretaries had not done. She broke no actual rules and, as far as everyone who's so far commented is concerned, no laws either. It doesn't make her look bad to anyone who bothers to use their time to research and to assess precedent.