well if they aren't doing background checks completely and properly, they're putting people's lives in danger, so yes, i do blame them. that's all i was saying.
And currently, under the law, in those circumstances, they are held accountable.
What tremendous tax increases? His plan has it paid by Wall Street.
that's definitely a glittering generality. (thanks creative writing!) it's easy to say "the wealthy" or "wall street" will do something, but what are the details? what will be put into place, and how will he reach a level of agreement from wall street that he can actually put this plan into action? how much money specifically is he taking? and who are "wall street" anyway? everyone who invests? only certain people that invest? which ones?
that's definitely a glittering generality. (thanks creative writing!) it's easy to say "the wealthy" or "wall street" will do something, but what are the details? what will be put into place, and how will he reach a level of agreement from wall street that he can actually put this plan into action? how much money specifically is he taking?
Sanders proposes to pay for the program with a 0.5 percent tax on stock transactions and a 0.1 percent tax on bond transactions. This financial transactions tax (FTT) is intended to fall mainly on financial industry interests that trade frequently. But the tax would also have a heavy impact on mutual funds often held by middle-income investors saving for retirement. Actively managed mutual funds buy and sell stocks frequently, and the taxes incurred on these transactions will be passed through to fund investors. Transaction costs also affect index funds, which must buy and sell stocks as investors add and redeem their funds and as companies are included in and removed from target indices. The Sanders transaction tax would increase the costs of investing in all mutual funds, reducing their returns and retarding families’ ability to save for retirement.
The tax increases will always find their way into the already-tight middle-class pocketbooks
but like i said, does that apply to every wall street speculator, or only the particularly rich ones? how much exactly will they pay? what if the tuition costs more money than he plans to take? a small paragraph doesn't really tell me a lot of specifics.
The Goldman Sachs criticism is definitely one of the dumbest leveraged against Hillary.
1. She is an extremely prominent figure. Forbes listed her as the second most powerful woman in the world as of 2015. ANYWHERE she speaks, she's going to receive a big check. Prominent public figures get paid well for speaking engagements! This is not rare! This is not unheard of! It's NORMAL!
2. The one speech that we've heard from Goldman Sachs was about.... wait for it..... EMPOWERING WOMEN! Not off brand for her. Nothing wrong with that. I mean, really. Do people think she got on stage and said "Haha, those silly poor people! We sure got them!". Nobody uses their damn brain anymore.
This is just wrong. Rubio taking all the L's of late.
Rubio seriously talks as if he's going to steal the nomination at the convention I don't think he realizes how big of a scandal that would be, and it would basically kill the Republican party for good.
Fox News wasn't going to cut time out of their regular programming for Democrats 
