no

Let me read it...

Just let her go at this point so we'll never hear of this again

Hmm. Interesting...
It's going to be VERY hard for her to win the case.
...
The more I read into it, the less I know what to believe. I still support Kesha tho.

Let me get my reading glasses on.

Dr. Luke is dumb for not just terminating the contract, literally no one is on your side, no one will be on your side and keeping her under contract is just making it worse for you because the longer your keep her, the more backlash you'll get. Just let her the **** go!!!!

Ugh didn't make it past 20 pages, it didn't even start well. And they keep saying Kesha can record without Lule, but at the end of the day Luke's the one deciding which songs make the album and which not, so he can keep declining all the songs submitted! Consequently, no album out.

He's already forced himself on her once, now he's doing it again

Almost everyone on TMZ, People.com and Daily Mail is supporting Dr Luke. He has plenty of support. You very clearly haven't noticed it, somehow...

And what if Kesha is lying?

I read the entire first half up until the ruling that the preliminary injunction would be denied "at this point".

Honestly, I can see why this ruling was made. Kesha's lawyer's allegations of Sony not promoting any future Kesha material are just that, allegations, and unfortunately they're hard to prove with concrete facts because you can't really provide evidence for the future. Sony are saying they will promote, it's hard to prove that they won't.

I do disagree that there is a way that Kesha can stay in her current contractual agreement and have no interaction with Dr. Luke, given the fact that their contract states he must produce 6 songs on her album and everything goes through Kemosabe, Kasz Money and Prescription, which are all Luke's.

That's true. I'd say it's 50/50.
I mean, Kesha has the support of the industry but a lot of people are giving him the benefit of the doubt and go by "innocent until proven guilty" -- which is true -- and are believing the fact that she's lying to get out of the contract. However, we know that generally, vicitims of abuse are rarely believed and let's be real, most of the people supporting Luke ignored the full history between Kesha and Luke.

Dr Luke won't produce another Kesha song, ever.

Can someone who has read it sum up, what is saying?

Essentially, Kesha's lawyer argues that Sony's claims to let Kesha record without Luke in the picture at all are illusory and they have and will continue to support Luke over Kesha. Luke has generated a lot more money for Sony than Kesha has and so citing how much money has been invested into Kesha's career as reasoning for why Sony will continue to promote her is like a "drop in the bucket" compared to what Luke has and will continue to make.

Luke's lawyer, as well as Sony's lawyers, are alleging that they have made it clear to Kesha that she can record music without Luke's involvement and there's no need for any changes to be made to the contractual agreement, and certainly not a preliminary injunction. Sony claim that they've tried to get Kesha to record but she has refused and thus her being "put on ice" for two years while Luke has continued to work and profit as Kesha's lawyer claims is completely Kesha's choice.

The Court ruled in favour of Luke and Sony because there was not enough evidence provided that would demonstrate irreparable harm to Kesha's career if nothing was changed (given Sony had offered to let Kesha record without Luke, it would be her own doing if she didn't record) BUT there would be irreparable harm to Sony/Kemosabe if the contracts were nullified after investing so much money into Kesha's career.

It's very hard to believe she's lying since she reported in 2005 that he made unlawful advances to her, and wanted to leave Luke just after signing because of it.

She's not pulling this from nowhere, but knowing the court they'll ignore her allegations from 2005 because they "don't matter now".

The judge sounds like a total ****. She just interrupted the entire time.

I hate that this judge is essentially saying "they're allowing her to work for dr. luke without actually dealing with him" but ultimately everything she does still goes through him and he still profits from her. and they're like "well whats the problem then?" THATS the ****ing problem! she doesnt want any ties with him! just because hes not in the room with her doesnt mean anything. hes still apart of her work. god. and the court had the gall to be more concerned with how this affects sony seeing as theres only 3 major record companies? like yikes. cant even continue reading because its so frustrating.