He needs to reiterate his messages. He needs to prove why his approach is better than Clinton's. He hasn't did that.

And while Hillary is a Clinton he has to draw distinctions between her and Bill. She does have accomplishments of her own but it's not as extensive as his.

Leave the race.

The big news coming out of this is that Bernie won the Hispanic vote. I imagine that is still debatable but that's a big deal for him.

@Retro, it's absolutely too early to rely on primary polls. The polls being accurate in NV is a coincidence since nearly every pollster admitted the polling was highly inaccurate.

Oh so he did win the latino vote? Well I hope that it means they were enamoured with him than abandoned her

@mike no

California is notably less white than New York as a state, which favors her. The "home turf" thing does influence politics, but the extent to which it affects Vermont and New Hampshire for Bernie is stronger than it will be for Clinton. Remember too that NY is her "home" state, but not the state she's originally from or the state of which she was First Lady for Bill. It's not the same, and it's also geographically closer to Bernie's home than most other states.

Can we stop pretending that this is a crazy claim and actually look at the numbers and demographics?

Don't know, but he has a ton of obstacles
He's an atheist, not good for the black community
He's Jewish, not good for Muslim Americans (tho they're like 2%) + not good for foreign policy (how will he negotiate with the Arab world? They won't even sit @ the same table w him)

Yas queen in her red tunic!

If he did, then California is in play as well

FiveThirtyEight is saying it's highly unlikely that Sanders won the Latino vote.

Honestly...it's hard to say.

It comes down to electability and perceived readiness. Minorities tend to be more cautious and don't want to take chances, and Clinton is the "safe" choice in that regard. Obama (who was losing minorities BADLY in late 2007) was able to overcome this by winning IA outright. That showed minorities (blacks in particular) that Obama was viable to white voters, and thus a legitimate contender. It also helped that Clinton's campaign kinda imploded in the lead up to SC.

Not to mention, as far as actual ideology goes, minorities tend to be less liberal in general. The talk of who's a "real progressive" means little, because of lot of minority Dems are actually conservatives at heart, but can't get onboard with Republican racism.

So in conclusion...I don't really know what Sanders can do. I just think the nature of his populist movement is something that intrinsically doesn't appeal to minorities the same way it appeals to white liberals. If I were him I'd focus less on criminal justice and welfare reform (honestly, the average black voter doesn't have either as their most pressing issue) and lay out SPECIFIC plans about improving the economy.

When will the result from the gop SC primary start coming in?

Less white but more liberal

Not her state she was from but she represented it for years

Closer to Bernie but New England has nothing to do with the middle states politics wise

Let's not boy

Hillary coming off as genuine in this speech.

1) I said it will be decided in April, not that his ass would drop out

2) actually no, she'd still win

3) refer to above

4) yes that's my point

About 38 minutes when all polls close.

Could be slightly earlier

King of being Atheist and Jewish at the same time?

I'm so curious to see the result. Hoping that Kasich does better than Cruz, Rubio, and Bush lol.

Entry polls say he did, but like I said, it's debatable.

So if you won't listen to any of the points I make, and you won't listen to Nate Silver - who virtually all of us have relied upon for this whole primary - then who do you listen to on this issue?

"It can't be about what we're gonna give to you. It's gotta be about what we're gonna build together" or something like that.....BEAUTIFUL STATEMENT!