More critically acclaim as a Recording Artist? Katy or Brit
Both are known for catchy pop songs and good looks but it's no secret that neither are critic darlings, Britney has won a Pre telecast Best Dance Recording Grammy 11 years ago and only manage one more nomination after that, Katy holds a Female Grammy record for most nominations without a win but which one as a whole is more acclaim as a Recording Artist?
As solely an artist Katy is more respected I think, but as an overall celebrity/person Britney is more respected as she as seen as one of pop music's biggest icons by most people.
There's no such thing as "acclaimed by the GeePee". Acclaim is among critics.
Going off that logic the critics have been acknowledging Katy's work since 2008 while completing dismissing Britney's and now that I remembered "Pretty Girls" made every worst song of the year list on the year end 2015 lists a list that Katy has never made a appearance on
