Originally posted by Big Smoke

DAFUQ? 19 what? 19 Stone?

Originally posted by Big Smoke

DAFUQ? 19 what? 19 Stone?

Originally posted by risetoday

I'm interested to know what the actual size of the sweater was. If this girl was trying on anything smaller than a Large, she'll get no sympathy from me.

Originally posted by ks_dollar

She's exploring her legal options? What a fool. The clothes are not legally hers until she purchases them which she had not done when asking to try them on. She did not display any form on discrimination because she was simply trying to protect Walmart's clothes from being damaged. It's understandable a customer of her size has the potential to rip or ruin a piece of clothing due to her size -- the Walmart staff was kindly using her best judgement to determine whether the customer would tear the clothes or not. Letting a customer try on a piece of clothing that does not this size because telling them they would ruin it is simply ********.

By "bring everything out of the change room" the retail lady most likely casually referring to the items she tried to try on. This pretentious and deluded fat **** is truly something else.

The "you are a man you cannot try on women sweaters" thing though is something else.

Originally posted by Letemtalk

If the employee lets her try it on and it's damaged, her manager would be blaming her ....
"What were you thinking, you could tell she wasn't going to fit into that".