Our heroes in the National Review don't attack Trump by trying to exploit his extremism. On the contrary, in their view, Trump's flaw is that he doesn't go far enough. The refrain of the special issue that Lowry published this week is that Trump is not ideological, that he is willing to compromise, that he is not a true conservative.
Ignoring his racist and xenophobic comments about certain racial groups, he's the most moderate out of all the current Republican candidates. I wouldn't vote for him but it is the truth. He's just the loudest.
Talking about banning Muslims (and having security removing said Muslims) and holding North Korean-style propaganda openings at rallies is ''too moderate"?
Talking about banning Muslims (and having security removing said Muslims) and holding North Korean-style propaganda openings at rallies is ''too moderate"?
Well, aside from immigration and his Muslim ban (which even he seems to have forgotten about) he's pretty liberal on everything from gay marriage, abortion, affirmative action + healthcare.
Ignoring his racist and xenophobic comments about certain racial groups, he's the most moderate out of all the current Republican candidates. I wouldn't vote for him but it is the truth. He's just the loudest.
Well, aside from immigration and his Muslim ban (which even he seems to have forgotten about) he's pretty liberal on everything from gay marriage, abortion, affirmative action + healthcare.
Yep. Trump is an old man with common sense. Nothing wrong with that.
