Poll: Are people too harsh on Hillary Clinton? - Page 3

Giselle

Quote:

Originally posted by BritneysDaddy

She killed a US Ambassador and 5 of our men because of her political neglect. And Obama's bombing of libya without congressional authority is what caused the former to even be possible. bye!

Then she had the balls to lie to the public and say the Benghazi attacks were because of a youtube video when her emails to her daughter that night said the opposite. She was literally exposed for lying at her hearing and yet everyone said "HA QUEEN IS UNBOTHERED". Maybe if those who were killed were related to some of you you would care. Those men died for nOTHING. they were NOT supposed to even be in Benghazi. it was pointless deaths.

Don't come in here talking this BS. That situation has been investigated over and over and over again and time after time it has been determined that there was no wrongdoing on her part. She did not "neglect" anything. And even if she did, to go as far as to say she KILLED them? No, you sound like a ****ing idiot who falls for right wing propaganda. Use your brain and stop being such a sheep.

devotedtokesha

Not an American, but I would vote for Hillary. I love watching her debate. Queen of Politics indeed.

Istan4R

Quote:

Originally posted by King Maxx

We're all aware of Benghazi. It's not going to change her supporters minds.

Isn't that kind of sad? I don't get how you find that funny but ok

Blade

I don't mind the republicans dragging her but when Bernie stans clump her with Trump it's honestly gross.

YoYo

She's a Goddamn snake and deserves the hate.

Adonis

Quote:

Originally posted by Manimuni

Absolutely not. With all due respect, anyone running to be president is going to have their fair share of criticism. You're running for a position that will literally affect people's livelihoods, safety and future prospects. Your record matters. It's not a popularity contest, it's about who's best suited. Her record is mostly about securing power for herself, not implementing good policy. It doesn't help that she is a hypocrite on some things and obnoxiously alienates half the country, as if conservatives don't matter. With the Benghazi thing, it was revealed that she literally ignored the victims' requests for protection over 600 times. And after the fact, she told a blatant lie to the American people about the true cause of the horror. It was no riot over some video, it was planned days, maybe months in advance. That's the kind of integrity you want? She was a horrible secretary of state.

Exactly.

Clinton didn't ignore anything. Republicans tried to claim the information was classified and turns out the CIA said it was not classified and even then Clinton already testified to the facts of the Benghazi case and they still got nothing.

CIA says Republicans lying about Benghazi

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/1...as-GOP-s-fault

Quote:

For fiscal 2013, the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department’s Worldwide Security Protection program — well below the $2.15 billion requested by the Obama administration. House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....

[In 2011] Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.

[GOP vice presidential nominee Paul] Ryan, [Rep. Darrell] Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

Manimuni

Quote:

Originally posted by Adonis

Clinton didn't ignore anything. Republicans tried to claim the information was classified and turns out the CIA said it was not classified and even then Clinton already testified to the facts of the Benghazi case and they still got nothing.

CIA says Republicans lying about Benghazi

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/1...as-GOP-s-fault

She still lied to the families about the incident. They said there was a video and protests. But tensions had always been there are the threat always loomed. They definitely should have never been there.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WfVc23eJ3jo

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p8V5p4sL2K0

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DUObFqU5cgE

About classified information, we'll just have to wait to see what the FBI presents; word is that hundreds of classified emails have been retrieved. That doesn't mean she'll be indicted or prosecuted for having classified information on a private server, even though it's a felony (That's ultimately up to the Attorney General, who probably won't). But that just oozes with cronyism, the fact that any other person would face trial, but not Hillary.

Did she have her aide strip the emails of classified markings ? It's looking like that's the case.
http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/guybe...rking-n2101680

As for Republicans cutting the defense spending, I don't know. But a lot of the Republican base is sick of a lot of them too. They cut spending here, but let this trillion dollar Omnibus budget get through.

To be fair though, both parties need to start cutting spending on other things.