Originally posted by Kh-Loud

And she's stil not making as much money as her other peers. It's sad. Poor Rihanna

Originally posted by Kh-Loud

And she's stil not making as much money as her other peers. It's sad. Poor Rihanna

Originally posted by M A R C

Originally posted by Feanor

Wait I'm confused, according to Forbes, Taylor, Katy, Gaga, Justin Timberlake, Nicki Minaj, Beyoncé etc. are all more marketable?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcin...0b6a250586590e

Anyways congrats Rihanna

Originally posted by Deemy

I think its the turnover rate of how successful her endorsements are. For example, Her MAC VIVA Glam line was so successful that they extended their contract and let her do not 1 but 2 extra campaigns with her plus do a Holiday collection.

Her River Island collection. Brought great exposure to the brand she ended up doing an extra line with them.

her Armani collection. 1 deal turned into multiple capsules.

Her DIOR campaign is also extremely successful.

PUMA.. need I say more. Rihanna has done so much for the brand in her short tenure as Creative Director of the Women's Line that their profit and sales revenue is the highest its been in YEARS.

So the article is not saying that she's the most family friendly celeb but its her success to failure ratio and how she elevates the brands that DO endorse her making her the most marketable.

Originally posted by Kh-Loud

And she's stil not making as much money as her other peers. It's sad. Poor Rihanna

Originally posted by rihsus