Excerpt from "We Overuse the Term Supermodel, but Kendall Jenner and Gigi Hadid Really Are Worthy of the Title":
As
2015’s reigning model MVPs, Gigi Hadid and Kendall Jenner have become an inescapable part of the fashion conversation. With their reality-television backgrounds and mammoth social media presence, they are the most visible representatives of the new generation of top models. But are they supermodels?
Everyone...has been called a supermodel in recent months. The designation feels premature.
What truly pushed the supermodels over the edge was their mastery of media beyond fashion. Quintessential ’90s stars like Naomi Campbell, Linda Evangelista, Christy Turlington, Kate Moss, and Cindy Crawford require no introduction...the supers had a presence that impacted, or at least captivated, culture as a whole.
If any contemporary models come close, it’s Hadid and Jenner...they’ve got everyone from Riccardo Tisci to Karl Lagerfeld in their corner, and collectively they’ve racked up runway work with a slew of luxury houses. Collaborations with legendary photographers...have come their way, as have covers and campaigns.
Hadid is currently front and center on prestige glossies like Italian Vogue and Numéro, while Jenner landed one of four French Vogue 95th anniversary covers alongside Turlington, Moss, and Gisele Bündchen. Jenner and Hadid also have beauty deals.
But what truly makes Kendall and Gigi super material is the interest they generate off-duty.
Magazines and websites document each move the girls make with the kind of fervor typically reserved for movie stars and musicians, with every outfit and rumored new relationship dissected with alacrity...
Hadid and Jenner are the supermodel heirs apparent.
http://www.vogue.com/13376463/kendal...d-supermodels/
Do you agree?