Quote:
Originally posted by supercalz
Innocent until proven guilty doesn't really fit with the idea of sexual assault for the accuser or the accused though. It can ruin a person's career to be accused to something, but if 'innocent until proven guilty' is the thought process, then the accuser is painted as a liar until they are proved to be a victim (which is happening in this situation). How is that fair?
|
Like you said: it can ruin someone's reputation, career, and livelihood to be accused of something. So how would it be fair to just accept, without a trial, that Dr Luke raped Kesha?