Who cares? They're harmless

Not but it's annoying...

They just aren't. If you're offended, ad-block them.

They shouldn't be warn-able. Let people express their obsession. It's easier to drag them!!

Exactly.

I was wondering the same thing considering you get a WP for anything in here...

because you get WPs for your posts, not your avi, or usernames, etc.

that account who has "Dark Horse" username and uses Leona Lewis as avatar is so mean tho

They're all tragic, I can't talk to anyone who is sad enough to use avatars like that.

A Katy stan is sporting this one though

The psychopathic dedication of this ^ avi is impressive + it's funny as hell!

This site has enough restrictions already...the avi's are harmless.

I used to hate them but now I find them funny af.

Haha

They don't derail a thread, that's why allowed.

Some members really do find everything offensive.

yeah it should be warn-able
i mean they warn you for a nickname even if its a positive nickname
that makes no sense

Yeah it 's just nonsense and illogical.

Either you let people fully express themselves or you sanction every single shady thing.

Um the Gaga one is iconic

Because you can't report an avi?

I know someone who was permabanned over an avi...I mean, given it was ****, but still. It just shows that moderators DO moderate avatars. I think anything that should be acceptable as an avi should be acceptable as a post in a thread, though, It's really inconsistent.