Quote:
Originally posted by Sazare
Let it be known that the Pitchfork review of Emotion has been widely repudiated by music writers, including writers from Pitchfork itself, for being largely fallacious and sexist. They're obviously not infallible, but they do hold critical cachet. My point, as was quite clear, was that Carly inhabits the same field as the likes of Robyn and Sky Ferreira whereas Lorde is in roughly the same field as Meghan Trainor. They're in completely different lanes. This should be quite evident once critics' year-end lists start rolling out, where Emotion will have a much bigger presence than Pure Heroine did (not that that would be hard).
But then if you genuinely believe commissioning songs--only two of which she was even involved in creating--to be on a soundtrack is a sign of "talent" there's genuinely no point in trying to carry on a conversation here.
|
Absolutely not. People who like Carly often love girly dreamy groups such as LM, 5H. Also other "pure pop" girls like Robyn, Betty Who, Tegan and Sara, Foxes etc.
Now people who like Lorde tend to love tumblr oriented girls like Lana, Sky, Marina and Florence. It's pretty obvious actually, that Meghan shade wasn't cute and you know it's a LIE.
We'll have to wait until the YE lists, don't make assumptions just yet. Carly's buzz is pretty much over (I blame the early JP release) and people (including critics) already moved on from it. It was cute for like a month, now it sounds just like every other pop album out there. Nothing stands out.
And no, the sign of Lorde's talent is her songwriting, which is something the critics love the most about her. Critics like Carly's productions, and she takes no credit for that considering she isn't involved in the process.