I was watching this video of Jackie Evancho and Sara Brightman performing together for nostalgia reasons and I saw a stanwar developing in the comments :
Quote:
Jackie is singing circles around Sarah
Quote:
No she is not. Dont get me wrong Jackie is amazing in every way. But singing circles around Sarah she is not.
Quote:
Sarah Brightman is a relatively terrible singer, her career would be nonexistent without Andrew Lloyd Webber. Meanwhile Jackie has destroyed her voice due to over singing with an underdeveloped voice.
Quote:
No she wasn't. Sarah didn't want to upstage the kid. She wanted it to sound balanced. Jackie wouldn't pass an audition for any musical theatre production. Sarah has done the lot. you're being disrespectful. Having said that; there are a lot better singers around than Sarah.
Quote:
I have absolutely no respect to give to sarah brightman, she is the laughing stock of the classical music industry. Jackie is just a kid with minimal talent and bad singing habits. Sarah's voice is out of control in this performance regardless of what she was attempting to do.
Quote:
LOL She is the laughing stock? The most successful female classical singer in history is a laughing stock?LOL At least we now know you don't know jack s__t. You are a laughing stock.
Quote:
Also, Jackie Evancho's "minimal talent and bad singing habits" have taken her all the way to the top of her genre worldwide. Furthermore, it is very evident that millions of others, including David Foster and Andrea Bocelli, do not share that same opinion of her vocals. As usual, the personal opinions and inputs from the trolls regarding one of the greatest female singing prodigies of all time are totally void of any credibility.
Quote:
Jackie sings like a true scooled opera singer while Sarah is just a pop-singer trying to sing opera, she is not comfortable
Mess at even them fighting for their faves. Thoughts? Who sang better Jackie or Sarah?
Sis, this is not news. Opera stans are literally 10x more vicious than pop stans, it's just that since most of our faves are retired or dead we don't post as much. Leave any remotely negative comment on a Maria Callas vid and the Mari-gency will find you
Sis, this is not news. Opera stans are literally 10x more vicious than pop stans, it's just that since most of our faves are retired or dead we don't post as much. Leave any remotely negative comment on a Maria Callas vid and the Mari-gency will find you
This is actually true and there are also classical forums where classical fans are doing the exact same thing we're doing here, except arguing about artists who've been dead for centuries
This is actually true and there are also classical forums where classical fans are doing the exact same thing we're doing here, except arguing about artists who've been dead for centuries
This is actually true and there are also classical forums where classical fans are doing the exact same thing we're doing here, except arguing about artists who've been dead for centuries
Omg i just searched "opera forum" and found one with this thread :
Quote:
Wagner vs. Every Other Person Who Has Ever Existed
Mo
Quote:
ira's Avatar
Moira said:
May-04-2012 07:20
Default Hmm. I just worry about the people who are tone deaf. They are part of the 'every other person' portion. I often get to stand near one of them in church. They usually like singing LOUDLY and have absolutely no idea how awful they sound. I think I prefer Wagner to those individuals.
On the other hand one doesn't have to pay to hear the tone deaf crowd.
Quote:
The draggings,thread titles and jpg usage,Atrl teas
