Quote:
Originally posted by Ascension
Yes. Considering their services are being used by millions to possibly billions of people. It's no different from someone starting a company that becomes huge and services huge amounts of people or invents something that takes off or makes a scientific discovery that's hugely impactful on a mass level. Their income fairly is generated by scale and reach even if some feel like what they do isn't important as say being a public servant like a social worker or teacher or fireman.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Almighty Gaga
If we go by work value, then no they don't. A song is less useful than say a policeman service.
If we go by public consumption, then yes they do. McDonalds is richer than a random car company, even though a car is more useful and more valuable than a Mc meal.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Badger
Musicians don't have salaries; their income generally depends on how many people buy their music. So they deserve the money that people give them in return for music.
|
All of this.

Though personally I feel like athletes get way more than they deserve, but I think instead of taking money away from other jobs that generate it deservingly, more money should be given to teachers, firefighters, doctors and non-minority-murdering cops.