37th weeks:
1989 around 29,212 at #4 in sales
Fearless 37,227 at #9
22% decline in 6 years; not bad, especially given how 1989 started much bigger.
For Fearless, there were 8 consecutive T10 weeks after this point, then a few weeks off, then 15 more T10 weeks, 1 week off, then 4 final T10 weeks. We'll see how 1989 compares...
This bitch needs to play All Too Well at least once on this tour, Nashville or Boston, the 2 places she loves the most and with the most devoted fans. I can't at the sing along "AND YOU CALL ME UP AGAIN JUST TO BREAK ME LIKE A PROMISE SO CASUALLY CRUEL IN THE NAME OF BEING HONEST"
37th weeks:
1989 around 29,212 at #4 in sales
Fearless 37,227 at #9
22% decline in 6 years; not bad, especially given how 1989 started much bigger.
For Fearless, there were 8 consecutive T10 weeks after this point, then a few weeks off, then 15 more T10 weeks, 1 week off, then 4 final T10 weeks. We'll see how 1989 compares...
Yas 1989 better stay inside the Top10 for two years
Her performances during the RED era were amazing. WANEGBT at the VMAs, Trouble at AMAs and Brits, 22 at BMAs, Red at CMT Awards and All Too Well at the Grammys.
Why did she erroded from that during the 1989 era. Ha performances this era are bad to boring thh.
37th weeks:
1989 around 29,212 at #4 in sales
Fearless 37,227 at #9
22% decline in 6 years; not bad, especially given how 1989 started much bigger.
For Fearless, there were 8 consecutive T10 weeks after this point, then a few weeks off, then 15 more T10 weeks, 1 week off, then 4 final T10 weeks. We'll see how 1989 compares...
And where was RED at the same tracking week? Or would it be best if we not go there?
Her performances during the RED era were amazing. WANEGBT at the VMAs, Trouble at AMAs and Brits, 22 at BMAs, Red at CMT Awards and All Too Well at the Grammys.
Why did she erroded from that during the 1989 era. Ha performances this era are bad to boring thh.
There have only been like 2 performances this era.
