Discussion: First Polygamy application filed - Lawsuit to follow - Page 4

Retro

Quote:

Originally posted by Chucko

Monogamy is not a instinctual construct and is not instinctual to any animal. Humans are promiscuous animals. You have to understand the nature of humans and our natural predispositions because they are relevant. Monogamy is completely a social construct.

There is no point debating this with you since we can't get past this point.

Because you're literally wrong. There are many species that mate for life - 5% of mammal species (which is actually still a significant number, mind you) including about 6% of primates.

Like, what? Okay.

BGXKB

Quote:

Originally posted by Bathomet

One could say gays have always had the right to marry, every gay person could marry (a person of the opposite sex).
One could say no poligamious marriage is denying poligamous people a right non-poligamous people have.

Your logic is a bit flawed to me, but whatever.

Your logic is nonexistent. Poligamous people are just like everyone else, they just choose to have more than one spouse. It's not at all the same thing as being attracted to the same-sex

Also, there is nothing in the Constitution which could be interpreted as allowing for poligamous marriages because it is not a Constitutional right.

Anything4Minaj

Anything for a hit thread I see.

Eric.

Whether the "right to marry" is about someone of the opposite sex, of the same sex or as many people as you want, you can't say say this rigt is being denied or unfulfilled when you're already married to one person.