JLo's albums are bad, and basically all critically bashed. Her singles have had legal troubles with accusations of stealing, stealing samples, uncredited vocals, etc and this decade have just been terrible. It's understandable why she hasn't won a GRAMMY.
Katy's albums are bad, and basically all critically bashed. Her singles have had legal troubles with accusations of stealing, stealing samples, uncredited vocals, etc and this decade have just been terrible. It's understandable why she hasn't won a GRAMMY.
Katy's albums are bad, and basically all critically bashed. Her singles have had legal troubles with accusations of stealing, stealing samples, uncredited vocals, etc and this decade have just been terrible. It's understandable why she hasn't won a GRAMMY.
JLo's albums are bad, and basically all critically bashed. Her singles have had legal troubles with accusations of stealing, stealing samples, uncredited vocals, etc and this decade have just been terrible. It's understandable why she hasn't won a GRAMMY.
Quote:
Originally posted by Raava
JLo
Katy's albums are bad, and basically all critically bashed. Her singles have had legal troubles with accusations of stealing, stealing samples, uncredited vocals, etc and this decade have just been terrible. It's understandable why she hasn't won a GRAMMY.
Obviously Katy but both deserve them way more than some artists who have them so I don't see why this site acts like Grammys are the end of it all of critical success.
Xtina has more Grammys than Britney but a smaller Metacritic average for example. It's all relative
J.Lo by far. She led the Latin pop invasion in the late '90s and the urban pop takeover of the early '00s. Though her musical talents are questionable - she has made a considerable contribution to music and turned out some of the most iconic hits of the past 15 years
