There may be no age restrictions but ATRL isn't generally considered a site suited for easily-offended children or more conservative people. Neither is pop culture in general. It is what is is. No need to suddenly turn into such a prude just for a chance to attack SupahBass. It's just kinda childish
ATRL doesn't have an age minimum for members, or if it does, there's still 1000's of guests that range from all age groups. When you have active fanbases and threads on stars like Zendaya, Selena Gomez, and Bella Thorne there's obviously a young age group that is following the site. And you can't really say 'they're too young for ATRL' when ATRL themselves claim to be a family site and have never advised any age groups not to browse the site. So yeah, as much as some adults and people with different morals think the whole shirtless men thing is fine, ATRL has to be respectable to all age groups, let alone people from different backgrounds. There's so many people browsing from countries like Russia, Saudi, South Africa, etc. What do you think would happen to them if people saw them on a site with shirtless men?
Quote:
Originally posted by RoarRiteNow1
There may be no age restrictions but ATRL isn't generally considered a site suited for easily-offended children or more conservative people. Neither is pop culture in general. It is what is is. No need to suddenly turn into such a prude just for a chance to attack SupahBass. It's just kinda childish
While we understand that sexual content is a part of popular culture, we also don't want this to return to a site with **** threads and graphic avatars. It's a complicated balance, and perhaps we err on the side of caution sometimes. But it's certainly never targeted at any member.
There may be no age restrictions but ATRL isn't generally considered a site suited for easily-offended children or more conservative people. Neither is pop culture in general. It is what is is. No need to suddenly turn into such a prude just for a chance to attack SupahBass. It's just kinda childish
'in general' as in not everyone. We have to be respectful and appealing to everyone, not 'a general' crowd. Hence why Giselle's avatar is being taken down, even though this 'in general' is a forum full of gay guys who aren't thinking anything sexual about a woman in a bikini top. Yeah, nobody attacked him either. I gave an example of an avatar allowed and he actually came and attacked me and RatedG2 because he was being childish. Sorry.
While we understand that sexual content is a part of popular culture, we also don't want this to return to a site with **** threads and graphic avatars. It's a complicated balance, and perhaps we err on the side of caution sometimes. But it's certainly never targeted at any member.
That's fair enough Regarding the targeting comment I wasn't talking about the mods but referring to the member who randomly brought up SupahBass and started making those shady remarks about "weird fantasies" and "getting sex drives going" clearly targeted at him. I just found his personal vendetta against SupahBass kinda childish is all
Regarding the targeting comment I wasn't talking about the mods but referring to the member who randomly brought up SupahBass and started making those shady remarks about "weird fantasies" and "getting sex drives going" clearly targeted at him. I just found his personal vendetta against SupahBass kinda childish is all