Originally posted by YouBetterPopBitch

What's the big deal ?!

Let the good sis Hilary prefering the Britney's version.
There's nothing bad about it, stop acting superior or something. I wouldn't call Brit's version better than the original because it's just not, but the cover is more than decent and she made it her own instead of acting like a pseudo rock star that she's not. She made a pop / r'n'b version of it, even the legend Mick Jagger thought she "did very well"

Originally posted by DIVO DIVINE

These posts explain a lot about Britney/Pop music fans and their lack of musical knowledge and good taste... I guess I'm ignorant too because I've never heard Britney's cover.

Originally posted by Glamazon

That vma performance WAS iconic tho so I see her point

Originally posted by Great Username

She did render the original irrelevant

Originally posted by Shaliydah88

Not going to lie... Before I heard the originals, I thought OLAS and Material Girl were their songs.

Originally posted by ReachOut

This post explain how pop-haterz/rock music stans feel so ****ing superior to everyone

Originally posted by DIVO DIVINE

These posts explain a lot about Britney/Pop music fans and their lack of musical knowledge and good taste... I guess I'm ignorant too because I've never heard Britney's cover.

Originally posted by princedonte

I knew it was a cover when I read the credits in the booklet I also knew The Beat Goes On was a cover too when it came out. I know everything.

Originally posted by ElectricFrancis

The ignorance

The pathetic posts