News: U.S.A. funding ISIS?!? - Page 2

SegoForbRIHtney

Quote:

Originally posted by Bríseis

They are just following their own pattern - funding terrorist groups to overthrow the regime, destabilize the country and fuel the conflict by selling weapons to both sides while officially pretending to back the "good guys" and they always make sure to exploit the countries natural resources while its in war. Im not surprised, its a well known fact that US needs war to keep their economy going. Im just disgusted.

THIS. Afer World War II the U.S. noticed that thE economy did even better than it was before. People worked more and the U.S. made more money from it.

Jack Jackson

Quote:

Originally posted by Javan

We been knew this. They funded and trained Al Qaeda, same for ISIS. It's all money making scheme for weapon manufacteres and oil companies and the average US citizen has to face austerity as consequence. None of ya'll have once thought why over 50% of America's federal spending goes to "defence" meanwhile you're breaking your backs to pay for college. I wonder who really profits

Quote:

Originally posted by Bríseis

They are just following their own pattern - funding terrorist groups to overthrow the regime, destabilize the country and fuel the conflict by selling weapons to both sides while officially pretending to back the "good guys" and they always make sure to exploit the countries natural resources while its in war. Im not surprised, its a well known fact that US needs war to keep their economy going. Im just disgusted.

Kamil24

Obviously.

keerbyriri

Lol, revelation!!!!!!!

Chucko

Quote:

Originally posted by Adonis

Obama can say whatever he wants to and not do anything. He ultimately was concerned with nukes getting into ISIL hands. Once he was able to get the nukes out of the way you could tell he was wanting to not get involved which I wish he would not have. You are not going to fight a war overseas without troops on the ground. If he had stayed completely out of it after the nukes were secured, Iran and Saudi Arabia would've have to get themselves involved without would've been better for us. I think the only reason the US got involved is Israel TBQH....

First of all a president can't just go saying anything on the world stage and then back down from it. What kind of crazy is that? That red line was a huge mess and made us look like fools.

I don't know what you mean by nukes. Where would ISIL get a nuke from? The only countries that have them in or remotely in that area are India, Pakistan, Turkey and Israel. ISIL isn't going to stroll on to a NATO base in Turkey and grab a nuke, Israel sure as hell isn't leaving nukes lying around and India would never give them one. Pakistan is going to give ISIL a nuke but not Iran? Maybe you mean chemical weapons? I don't know you have me confused.

I agree 100% we can't fight a war over there by air alone. Unless we want to wipe cities off the map. Obviously not an option.

I don't think Israel had anything to do with it Obama has no love for Israel and he knows Israel can more then take care of themselves. If they ever were in need of our help Obama would send it. I have no doubt about that. The only threat to Israel is Iran if they are allowed to get a nuke and I don't think Israel is going to allow that. Obama knows this and pretty much everyone else does as well. If Israel has to they will attack Iran alone and that might drag us in to it. No Middle Eastern country will help Iran, they will be happy if Israel wipes out their nuke program. They will publicly denounce the attack and say thank you under their breath.