Very interesting.

I mean, in a way it makes sense. A huge brand like Calvin Klein doesn't have attractive half-naked men in their advertising campaigns because women and gay men buy their ****. It must appeal to heterosexual men on a certain level.

Because men want to BE the guys who are ripped and posing in their underwear. They want to be the ultimate female attraction.

...or so they say...

.

I don't buy the idea. If guys need underwear, they just pick up any pack and EVERY brand has a model on it.

Exactly.

I'm secure enough as a straight male to admit this. #NoHomo

and the lie detector test result says....

It's hilarious how it was once widely understood that men recognizing other men as attractive is common and natural and also that sexuality can be fluid. Now we're shocked to rediscover these things as we slowly and painstakingly unravel a ridiculously misinformed culture of binarism.

Ok I am looking back and nope. None of the guys around me gave a single fudge about this.

Is this something new?

Beauty and attractiveness appeal to everyone regardless of gender. like

Don't expose them, next thing you know they'll be at the register buying stuff and saying "no homo" because they're so insecure

Only because they want to look like them Mess at my dad having the Justin one though

What kind of gospel?
Like guys can't even say something like another guy is hot without saying no homo or something.

Or if a girl asks a guy if he thinks another guy is hot he'll say he has no opinion or he doesn't know when he clearly does.

Why is this shocking? People are attracted to attractive people.

Heterosexual men are not aliens.

David beckham isnt too hot nowadays is he but yeah of course that no homo is just a cover straight guys know if a guy is ugly or cute like..

They want to be the G.U.Y